A lady named Donna Brazile has been fired from her job as a guest contributor at CNN. Brazile is currently serving as temporary chairman of the Democratic National Committee after the former chairman stepped down in a scandal.
Brazile was fired for secretly giving in advance at least one debate question from CNN to Hillary Clinton during the primary elections of Spring 2016. And so we must wonder: Did Brazile give Hillary the questions in advance of the second presidential debate in October, moderated by CNN’s Anderson Cooper?
Let’s look into that. Nikitas3.com believes that Brazile should be fired from her DNC post too. Yet most Democrats would not say that Brazile did anything wrong since this is the way that most Democrats normally do business. Brazile even lied about having provided the question.
Brazile is a typically corrupt Democrat. She is black. She acts like a sweet, honest person but she is a Democrat liar and hack. In 1988 she was fired from the presidential campaign of Democrat Michael Dukakis for circulating a false story about Republican candidate George HW Bush.
This, friends, is what we expect from Democrats and from most of black America today since most blacks vote Democrat and have learned well the Democrat way of doing business, which is to win at all costs and lie whenever necessary.
This is why Democrats, socialists and communists always want to bar the Ten Commandments from public display since the Commandments tell us to live orderly and lawful lies, including always telling the truth.
We know that major black leaders like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have based their lives on lies, threats and intimidation. Sharpton even came to national prominence in 1986 by falsely accusing a group of white men of raping a black teenage girl.
Now we have the major scandal of our times unfolding around Hillary Clinton, who also is a serial liar. Not only do we know that she lied repeatedly in public statements this past Summer about her e-mail server, but now we have a case where thousands of State Department e-mails apparently ended up on the private computer of sex pervert Anthony Weiner, who is married to Clinton’s closest aide.
We have no idea what else happened to these emails or tens of thousands of other State Department emails since Clinton used an unsecured private server to avoid scrutiny of her communications, which could be charged as a violation of the Espionage Act (or would be charged that way if Clinton were a Republican).
This all happens because malicious and dishonest people like Hillary Clinton and Donna Brazile allow it to happen and make it happen through their debased characters. And we all know that this corruption is deeply embedded in the Democrat party and the Obama administration. We also now know, for instance, that FBI currently has five separate investigations going into the Clinton Foundation.
The media have become party to Democrat lies as well. Most of the big media in America like NBC, ABC, the New York Times and most other networks and newspapers simply re-tell the lies and deceptions of the Clintons and of Donna Brazile and the Democrats over and over. They do this without hesitation because they are an integral part of it.
This all could lead us to anarchy and crisis if Hillary Clinton is elected. Here is Democrat pollster Doug Schoen talking about Hillary Clinton, referring back to the Watergate scandal of 1973-4, which was a molehill compared to the mountain of corruption alleged to be around the Clintons:
What troubled me most, other than the crimes committed (during Watergate), was that the United States was paralyzed and unable to act. President Nixon and the government were rendered impotent, unable to govern and meet its responsibilities to the American public.
I worry that the same thing could happen after a (presidential) victory by Secretary Clinton and could carry on into her term of office. There will be no goodwill or honeymoon period for Clinton. Her first 100-days agenda will take a backseat to partisan divisions and polarization with little chance of constructive legislative action occurring.
In short, our entire nation will be significantly threatened if Hillary wins, and threatened not even by her policies, which would be bad enough. We would be threatened from what we already know and suspect about her. In other words, she will bring decades of corruption to the White House with her. And America cannot afford this.
Look at this from Realclearpolitics.com. This is from a former federal prosecutor and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is credited with being “the mayor who saved New York” with his honesty, integrity and good government:
Saturday evening on Fox News Channel’s ‘Justice with Jeanine Pirro’ former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani suggested that a grand jury already has enough evidence, from WikiLeaks and the FBI, to charge “Clinton Incorporated” (Bill and Hillary Clinton) with racketeering under the RICO laws that were originally designed to go after the mafia.
“I was shocked, back in July,” Giuliani said about FBI Director James Comey’s recommendation against charges for Clinton. “He laid out almost a prosecutorial memo and then came to a conclusion that he shouldn’t come to–that the Justice Department should–that she shouldn’t be indicted.”
“A special prosecutor should be appointed. A special prosecutor –a non-Republican, non-Democrat– should redo this whole investigation. And Obama should be required to promise he is not going to pardon any of these Clinton Incorporated– I think it’s a racketeering enterprise honestly,” he said.
“I have a whole bunch of statutes they’ve violated,” he said. “This is racketeering. This is a RICO statute–Clinton, Inc. I think it was one of the WikiLeaks that said this was ‘Clinton Inc.’ He does the speeches, they put the money in the pocket, she does the favors in the government. It all links up. Why did they destroy 33,000 emails? Because it shows the link.”
We also have the case of Huma Abedin, Hillary’s closest aide for 20 years. Now that FBI has seized one of Abedin’s personal computers in a probe into her husband Anthony Weiner, Hillary suddenly referred to Abedin as “a member of my staff.”
In short, Hillary is preparing to throw Abedin overboard. Because this is how liars and thieves always work – they always turn on each other to save themselves.
What will Abedin and Anthony Weiner do if Hillary is elected and if they find themselves under scrutiny or even indictment? Or even if Hillary loses the election and they find themselves under the spotlight?
Who knows, but it could get very, very ugly. Because Abedin knows all of Hillary’s darkest secrets. Abedin and Weiner could end up turning on Clinton and sinking her entire presidency and throwing our nation into crisis. This is not something that America can afford at this crucial time, which is why we must elect Donald Trump president.
If you don’t think that this is all big trouble for Hillary Clinton, look at this statement from Obama’s press secretary over FBI director James Comey re-opening his investigation into Hillary’s emails. This shows that Obama may be preparing to throw Hillary overboard in order to save himself:
Director Comey is a man of integrity and principle and well regarded by officials in both parties and served as a senior position in the Bush administration and got bipartisan support when his nomination to be director of the FBI was considered by the United States Senate… they speak to his good character and the president’s assessment of his integrity and his character has not changed. For example, the president doesn’t believe that Director Comey is trying to influence the outcome of the election. And the president doesn’t believe he’s secretly supporting a candidate or political party. He’s in a tough spot. He’s the one who will be in the position to defend his actions in the face of significant criticism from a variety of legal experts including officials who served in senior justice position for presidents led by both parties.
Normally we would expect Obama to issue a full-throated assault on Comey to protect a fellow Democrat like Clinton. This is what most Democrats are doing. But Obama is not. Why?
Well, we already know that Obama outright lied in a public statement when he said that he first found out about Clinton’s private e-mail server from news reports. So Obama already is seeing himself getting sucked into the Clinton corruption, and wants no part of it.
Because Obama knows that this is no way for a president to start a post-presidency period when he wants to begin building a legacy for himself. Obama knows that that legacy already is deeply tarnished by the terrible state of our nation after his eight years in the White House. If Obama gets drawn into the scandal around Hillary Clinton, he knows that there is grave danger ahead for him and his legacy.
You can expect Obama to further distance himself from Clinton as the scandal around her grows. The Clintons and the Obamas have never liked each other anyway.
(Please bookmark this website. And please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)