While the US media create a false narrative that president Trump and Trump supporters are anti-Semitic, that is the opposite of the truth.
The vehement anti-Semitism in the United States has its home on left-wing, pro-Palestinian college campuses, and among radical Muslims.
President Trump is perhaps the most pro-Israel president that America has ever had. On his trip to Israel he is being warmly welcomed as a friend and he is hoping to break through to a lasting peace in the Middle East.
He said that a “rare opportunity” exists for peace, and that the terror threats posed by Iran are causing Arab nations to focus on peace with Israel so that they can fight the infinitely more threatening terrorism being sponsored by Iran.
“There is a growing realization among your Arab neighbors that they have common cause with (Israel) in the threat posed by Iran,” president Trump said.
He added that “there’s a great feeling for peace throughout the Middle East”. Trump said in Israel that Saudi king Salman would “love to see peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.” This comes after Trump made an historic speech in Saudi Arabia about defeating terrorism.
“We have a rare opportunity to bring stability and peace in this region, defeat terror and create a future of peace. We can only get there by working together – there is no other way,” the president said.
This shows once again that we have a genuine leader in the White House. The president added: “Israel shares a commitment to peace – already made with Egypt and Jordan. The peace we seek is durable in which the Jewish state is recognized, security remains in Israel’s hands and conflict ends once and for all.”
This proves once again that the American media, so desperate to bring Trump down, are dealing with a truly caring and thoughtful man whom they will never defeat.
Every time the media think that they have Trump down – as in the Comey case – he bounces back even stronger, as he is doing on his trip abroad. Good. Congratulations, Mr. President, on another job well done.
Now here are two other commentaries for today:
Mueller Should be Fired
Here are excerpts from a great column by Greg Jarrett on Fox News about the newly-appointed special counsel Robert Mueller, a former FBI director. Mueller is supposed to investigate many issues surrounding the White House, including the firing of FBI director James Comey:
Robert Mueller has a serious conflict of interest that should disqualify him from serving as special counsel. He has had a long and close relationship with someone who will surely become a pivotal witness –James Comey.
…How can Americans have confidence in the results if they know the special counsel may harbor a conspicuous bias? They cannot. The conflict inevitably discredits whatever conclusion is reached. It renders the entire investigatory exercise suspect, and it only elevates the controversy surrounding it.
For this reason, Mueller should not serve as special counsel.
The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits him from serving if he has a conflict of interest in the case. The rule has been interpreted to mean that even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for disqualification.
A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. The conflict itself creates a clash between that individual’s self-interest or bias and his professional or public interest. It calls into question whether he can discharge his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner.
… So what exactly is Mueller’s conflict? He and Comey are good friends and former colleagues who worked hand-in-hand at the FBI and Department of Justice. Agents will tell you they were joined at the hip. They stood together in solidarity, both threatening to resign over the warrantless wiretapping fiasco involving then-Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2004.
Comey regards his predecessor as a mentor, while Mueller considers Comey his protégé. When Comey was appointed to succeed Mueller as FBI Director, both men appeared together and were effusive in their praise of one another. Their relationship is not merely a casual one. It is precisely the kind of association which ethical rules are designed to guard against.
OK, so there you go. If conservatives were investigating, say, Hillary Clinton, and appointed an investigator with such a conflict it would never be tolerated. There would be a media firestorm against it.
This should not be tolerated either. President Trump should expose this conflict in order to highlight an obviously tainted investigation. Now here is today’s third commentary:
Democrats Continue to Embrace Bad People
A ‘hard rock’ musician, singer Chris Cornell of the band Soundgarden, is reported to have hanged himself recently at age 52.
Cornell was a mean-looking and crazy-looking person, exactly what we might expect from ‘hard rock’. His suicide is yet another indication of the sickness and darkness in that world which is full of dissolute people who love Obama and hate Republicans. In the world of ‘hard rock’, deviant behavior is common including alcoholism, drug abuse, suicide, early death, sexual abuse, vile, profane and anti-social lyrics, anger, shabby appearance, insanity and depression.
We don’t even know about most of this stuff since it is considered normal or is hushed up by the media. Now compare it to conservatives like well-behaved, law-abiding Christians, US military, 2nd Amendment supporters, pro-life activists, police, etc. There is no comparison. One is dark and the other is light. Period. End of sentence.
Leftists love darkness. That, for instance, is why abortion is the central thesis of feminism. Or why there is so much psychosis and suicide in our liberal cities, even among the privileged and the wealthy. Or so much violence and misery in black precincts that voted 99% for Obama. Or why our public schools and universities have spiraled downward into corruption, censorship and failure.
This is manifested in so many ways. For instance, there was recently an incident in New York City where a driver slammed his car into a crowd of people in Times Square, killing one.
We know that Muslim terrorists are increasingly using this ‘ramming’ technique to kill Americans and Europeans. Yet within a brief period after this incident a headline on CBS New York read:
1 Person Dead, 19 People Hurt When Car Slams Into Pedestrians In Times Square
NYPD: This Is Not Terrorism, But Possibly DWI
We see this over and over: Incidents are declared “not terrorism” or “not thought be terrorism” immediately even though the facts are not even in. This is part of the War on America by the media and Democrat party, to divert us from the idea that terrorism is even happening.
The initial police report should have said nothing about the motive. After all, the cops could never know everything about the history of the driver of the car in just an hour or two after the incident.
Times Square has been in the news like this before. In 2010 a terrorist tried to detonate a car bomb in Times Square, but the bomb failed to blow. Then, even before we knew that the perpetrator was a Muslim from Pakistan, the Trump-hating mayor of New York conjectured at the time that the bomb was planted by “someone upset with the (Obama) health-care bill”, which had been recently passed.
In other words the mayor reflexively blamed a conservative white person for the actions of a Muslim terrorist in order to create a distracting narrative. This is deplorable but expected for an elitist white multi-billionaire New Yorker who hates patriotic caucasian Americans who live in “red” counties and states that voted for Trump.
Then when violent acts are proven to be Islamic terrorism we are told by Democrats like Obama that it is something else like ‘workplace violence’, as in the case of the Fort Hood terrorism of 2009, or it was result of personal anger or family problems (Pulse nightclub murders), i.e., anything but Islam.
In the case of the Boston Marathon bombing of April 15, 2013 the lead perpetrator was a Muslim immigrant from a radical Muslim enclave in Russia. He was not even a US citizen and he had even been interviewed by FBI about a suspicious visit that he made back to Russia. He was released, not deported.
Then he and his brother were able to construct bombs in his taxpayer-subsidized apartment and waltz into the marathon crowd with big backpacks with the bombs inside with no scrutiny from Boston police.
It gets worse: In the hours after the marathon bombing, before we knew who did it, the US media conjectured widely that the bombing was perpetrated by protesting anti-tax white conservatives, since it happened on tax deadline day.
Sound familiar? Even the Fort Hood terrorist was well-known as an extremist to military officials, yet they did nothing about him for fear of offending his Muslim sensibilities.
Now look at this from the Blue Lives Matter website about a black immigrant from Africa who murdered two white American doctors in Boston. This story has not appeared in the national US media in order to protect evil immigrants and blacks:
Prior plea deals that allowed Bampumim Teixeira to keep his (immigration) green card and prevent his deportation cost two innocent doctors their lives last Friday, May 5.
According to The Boston Herald , police were called to the (doctor’s) apartment after being notified by a friend of Dr. Fields that he had received a text message begging for help. Upon arrival, the suspect, Teixeira, opened fire on police, and was shot three times; he remains hospitalized.
Both victims, Dr. Richard Fields, age 49, and Dr. Lina Bolanos, age 38, were found bound, and with their throats cut. Teixeira forced Dr. Fields to watch in a mirror as his throat was cut.
Teixeira was arraigned in his hospital room on Monday, May 8, and he appeared unconscious throughout the proceeding. His attorney, who represented him on his previous charges, entered not guilty pleas. He is expected to recover; unfortunately, his victims won’t.
In 2016, Teixeira was arrested by the FBI Bank Robbery Task Force for robbing a branch of Citizens Bank. He threatened to shoot up the bank if he didn’t get the money he demanded. The teller thought he had a gun and feared for her life. He only got $212, and a dye pack.
While being questioned about that bank robbery, he told police that he was also wanted for a 2014 robbery of the same bank. He got $600 that time, also while threatening to shoot up the bank. He was so helpful that he told detectives he had seen his wanted picture on the Mass Most Wanted website. Teixeira was shown the wanted picture of himself and told detectives that was him.
With two bank robbery charges, he should have served a lengthy prison sentence and then been deported, but he wasn’t. Under an agreed-upon deal, the prosecutor and the defense attorney allowed Teixeira to plead to two “larceny from person” charges instead of two bank robbery charges.
Plea deals like this are becoming more and more common as prosecutors in Palo Alto, New York, and Baltimore have all recently made the news for reducing sentences to prevent deportations. Legal non-citizen immigrants who are convicted of crimes with a sentence of 365 days or more are deported.
Recommendations were made to Judge Lisa A. Grant that Teixeira be given a sentence of 364 days in jail, one day less than a full year, with nine months to serve, credit for time served of 78 days, and the rest suspended for three years.
The most Honorable Judge Grant accepted the plea. This is the same Judge Grant who is fairly new to the bench, having been a defense attorney and public counselor services director in her previous career. She has also stated that she does not favor mandatory minimum sentences, because they take away a judge’s discretion.
What was also interesting about the plea deal was that Judge Grant accepted it orally, and did not require it to be in writing.
Both the prosecutor and defense attorney asked that the first robbery case be marked “guilty filed,” which exempts Teixeira from immigration penalties such as deportation.
So there you go. Grant has made a career as a pro-illegal-immigration left-wing activist, and two fine doctors are dead as a result.
Once there was an America when we identified evil and prosecuted it. We were vastly safer when we did that. After all, you must be able to identify evil to defeat it and Democrats now won’t even identify it, like Obama refusing to use the words “radical Islamic terrorists”.
As recently as May 19 a Turkish passenger tried to enter the cockpit of an American Airlines plane near Hawaii. No doubt it was an attempted act of Islamic terrorism, but we will never hear much or anything about it on NBC, CBS, CNN, etc.
If FBI had been even slightly more vigilant then 9/11 never would have happened. But FBI has been emasculated by years of investigations and accusations by the socialists and Democrats, and infiltration by anti-American actors. There were warning bells ringing about 9/11 for years before it occurred. And if just one of those bells had been investigated the whole plot would have unwound.
It is no surprise that most of 9/11 was plotted, planned for and rehearsed under Democrat president Bill Clinton when the bells were ringing loudly in the mid- to late-1990s. President George W. Bush had ramped up anti-terror security after he took office in January 2001, but it was too late. Too much bad stuff already had passed under the bridge, without scrutiny.
(Please bookmark this website. And please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)