‘Greenies’ Made Yet Another Totally Backward Prediction

First, here is a quick word about president Trump’s growing federal investigation into voter fraud. This is from Breitbart News:

Colorado is one state that has agreed to comply with the voter fraud commission that President Donald Trump put in place with an executive order in May.

And now county clerks in that state are reporting that they’ve seen hundreds of people withdraw their voter registrations.

A spokesperson for the Denver Elections Division told a Denver media outlet that 180 people have withdrawn their registrations in the county since Monday of this week.

In Arapahoe County, which includes the city of Aurora, at least 160 people have withdrawn their registrations since July 1, the outlet reported.

That’s 340 people in just two counties in just the first weeks after Colorado announced that it would comply with the Trump fraud panel. Multiply that by 3,144 counties in America, and extend it over an entire year and you have a major problem probably involving as many as 1 million to 2 million fraudulent voters.

Obviously these people in Colorado are withdrawing their registrations because they are guilty of fraud and do not want to get caught. They are probably illegal immigrants.

But wait. There’s much more. This is only the beginning. When we add on all of the other types of fraud, nationwide voter fraud probably goes up to 5 million or more, just like we conservatives have always said. This fraud has obviously tipped many elections to the Democrats. If you want to read about the many forms that Democrat voter fraud really takes, click here.

Thus the Trump voter fraud commission has not even collected or analyzed any data, and already it is working well. This is like Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigrants and his proposal to build a border wall, which are causing millions of potential illegal aliens to stay in their home countries because they are afraid of Trump. Many illegals also are leaving the US.

So the mere talk of voter fraud or illegal immigration is having a major effect. Good. Now here is today’s main editorial:

If you lived through the 1960s and 1970s and the beginning of the ‘green’ movement, you remember all of the doomsday predictions about the earth’s future. They continue today with ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’.

The most dire prediction back then was that the world’s population was growing so fast that man would soon outstrip the world’s resources. This was summarized in books like The Population Bomb by alarmist Paul Ehrlich, which predicted mass starvation in the 1970s and 1980s.

Many ‘green’ fanatics also predicted that oil would run out by 1980 or 1990. Yet today the world has more oil than ever, and bigger reserves than ever and we are finding more oil than ever, and much more easily than ever with modern technology. The only real oil supply problems have been man-made, like the Arab oil embargos of the 1970s or like environmentalist restrictions on where we can drill for oil.

In fact every prediction that these kooks have made has been proven laughably wrong. Look at the list at the end of this commentary for a good chuckle. Here is just one example from ‘greenie’ Kenneth Watt in 1970:

“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”

Yet for the last 20 years the ‘greenies’ have been obsessing about the planet burning up in ‘global warming’. Amazing.

Now look at what the real concern should be, and it is not that mankind is doomed by OVERpopulation but by the opposite – collapsing population numbers. This shows once again how environmentalists get virtually everything exactly backwards. Look at this from Newscientist.com:

Could the population bomb be about to go off in the most unexpected way? Rather than a Malthusian meltdown (of overpopulation), could we instead be on the verge of a demographic implosion?

To find out how and why, go to Japan, where a recent survey found that people are giving up on sex. Despite a life expectancy of 85 and rising, the number of Japanese is falling thanks to a fertility rate of just 1.4 children per woman, and a reported epidemic of virginity. The population, it seems, are too busy (and too shy) to procreate.

It’s catching. Half the world’s nations have fertility rates below the replacement level of just over two children per woman. Countries across Europe and the Far East are teetering on a demographic cliff, with rates below 1.5. On recent trends, Germany and Italy could see their populations halve within the next 60 years.

The world has hit peak child, says Hans Rosling at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden. Peak person cannot be far behind.

For now, the world’s population continues to rise. From today’s 7.4 billion people, we might reach 9 billion or so, mostly because of high fertility in Africa. The UN predicts a continuing upward trend, with population reaching around 11.2 billion in 2100. But this seems unlikely. After hitting the demographic doldrums, no country yet has seen its fertility recover. Many demographers expect a global crash to be under way by 2076.

OK, so first of all notice that the country with the most severe problem is Japan, which is one of the most socialistic nations on earth. Japan, for instance, has the biggest percentage debt by far of all of the industrialized nations and has been in a severe economic crisis since 1990 since it refuses to make capitalist reforms.

In short, the Japanese do not even know how to have children – which is really pretty easy – never mind doing things like creating economic growth or providing jobs for their people, or cutting their debt.

And if you think that this population collapse is a good thing, as ‘greenies’ do, then think again. If you ever have visited a small town where the young people have fled, you can see what happens. There simply aren’t enough people to keep the town going, or even to sit on the town council. It becomes a depressing place full of old people, empty houses and boarded-up stores. Hope disappears, just as environmentalism tells us over and over that there is no hope for man.

The most immediate way to address this crisis is to stop the spread of anti-family and feminist propaganda from the socialist left. This propaganda has told us for decades that families are bad, that children are a burden to the feminist lifestyle, that people are a threat to the environment, etc.

The most disturbing part of this equation is that population growth is slowing most significantly in the wealthiest and smartest nations, which are responsible for the technology that sustains the world today. These nations also represent the smallest part of the world’s population. Europe and the United States together represent only about 10% of the world’s people but 50% of the world’s total wealth, which is around $74 trillion per year.

But this population collapse is what ‘greenies’ want. They hate the advanced nations that they claim use too much of the world’s resources.

The doom-and-gloom predictions about overpopulation show once again that environmentalism has always feasted on fear; that is how the Sierra Club gets its money – by constantly telling donors about the impending destruction of the planet while always avoiding discussion of the many ways that environmentalists themselves destroy the environment, as outlined here by Nikitas3.com.

That is also why you have these left-wing nuts like Stephen Hawking – the British “physicist” who is all squished up in his wheelchair – now saying that Trump environmental policies are leading irreversibly to the end of the world. Here is the Huffington Post reporting on July 3, 2017:

British theoretical physicist and cosmologist Stephen Hawking is not mincing words: President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the landmark Paris accord combating climate change could cause irreversible harm to the planet.

In an interview with the BBC in honor of Hawking’s 75th birthday, the Cambridge professor said Trump will cause “avoidable environmental damage” by denying climate change evidence and leaving the agreement.

“We are close to the tipping point where global warming becomes irreversible,” he said. “Trump’s action could push the Earth over the brink, to become like Venus, with a temperature of two hundred and fifty degrees, and raining sulphuric acid.”

This guy Hawking is a total fraudster. He is like a Hollywood director looking to keep his name in the news with every new film, each one becoming more and more sensationalist. Look at this from May 5, 2017 in the Chicago Tribune

In November (2016) Stephen Hawking … gave humanity what we thought was an intimidating deadline for finding a new planet to call home: 1,000 years.

… Now Hawking, the renowned theoretical physicist turned apocalypse warning system, is back with a revised deadline. In “Expedition New Earth” — a documentary that debuts this summer (2017) as part of the BBC’s “Tomorrow’s World” science season —‚ Hawking claims that Mother Earth would greatly appreciate it if we could gather our belongings and get out — not in 1,000 years, but in the next century or so.

So in just 8 months he went from 1,000 years to 100 years. This guy is a faker, and to understand him you have to recognize what he is.

Hawking is not a scientist, like we are supposed to think. He is a “theoretical physicist”. In other words, he does not work in a lab doing experiments. He sits around thinking things up. Everything that he says is theoretical and there is no way to prove any of it, like Albert Einstein was also a theoretical physicist.

And if you want to know the truth about Einstein, he was a joke, just like Hawking is a joke. Nikola Tesla, who developed our system for generating and transmitting electricity back in the 1880s, thought that Einstein was a fool, and Tesla would certainly say the same about Hawking today.

But why should we believe Tesla in the first place?

Answer: Because Tesla was a real scientist who gave us something crucial after decades of hard work and experimentation. Our modern world would not even exist without Tesla’s genius (Tesla held more than 700 patents). Meanwhile Einstein and Hawking give us only unprovable theories. The New York Times reported in 1935:

(Tesla) announced that (Einstein’s) theory of relativity is “a mass of error and deceptive ideas and opposed to common sense,” and that “not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”

This is true. But that does not stop the global media from relentlessly fawning about Hawking, or Einstein. The Washington Post reported on August 25, 2015:

Hawking focused on something called the information paradox, which continues to puzzle scientists who study black holes. In a nutshell, the paradox involves the fact that information about the star that formed a black hole seems to be lost inside it, presumably disappearing when the black hole inevitably disappears. These things cannot be lost, according to the way we think the universe works, and physicists generally believe that they aren’t really lost. But where does the information go when the black hole that’s absorbed it goes kaput?

Blah, blah, blah… It never ends. This stuff is all preposterous theoretical gobbledygook. But then again this is the way that Hawking makes his living and draws attention to himself. He should really be in the ‘fiction’ section of the library, not under physics. Because he really thinks like a novelist, not a scientist.

Now here is the doomsday list from the eco-leaders. Every forecast made on the first “earth day” in 1970 has been proven spectacularly wrong like these 12 end-of-the-world predictions (thanks to Reason.com for this list):

1. “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” — Harvard biologist George Wald
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner
3. “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.” — New York Times editorial
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich
5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.” — Paul Ehrlich
6. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day
7. “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.” — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter
8. “In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.” — Life magazine
9. “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
10. “Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” — Paul Ehrlich
11. “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn’t any.'” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
12. “[One] theory assumes that the earth’s cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun’s heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine

(Please bookmark this website. And please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.