Liberals love to use deceptive words to maximum effect. For instance “welfare” is called “government assistance”. Or “illegal immigrants” are called “undocumented workers”. Or “government health care” is strangely called “single payer”.
Now we hear the word “dreamers” to mean younger people who came to the US with their illegal alien or refugee parents; or who were born to illegal-alien or refugee parents within the US; or who came to the US as young people alone, without adults (“unaccompanied minors”) in the huge inflow from Central America in the last year of Obama.
The “dreamer” designation ignores the fact that hundreds of thousands of younger people, and maybe many more, have simply entered the US illegally, maybe millions.
The name “dreamers” comes from the DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act), a US Senate proposal from 2001 that was never implemented.
The word “dreamer” is intended to imply that they are all “dreaming” of the American Dream of success and never have done anything wrong. But the truth shows otherwise in many, many cases. Here are three examples that we know of simply because these were major cases:
Two “dreamers” that come to mind are the muslim Tsarnaev brothers from Russia, who bombed the Boston Marathon in 2013. They were scam artists, drug dealers and terrorists, while others in their refugee family are con artists and thieves.
Or how about this from Wikipedia about another “dreamer”:
On November 28, 2016, a terrorist vehicle-ramming and stabbing occurred at 9:52 a.m. EST at Ohio State University’s Watts Hall in Columbus, Ohio. The attacker, Somali refugee Abdul Razak Ali Artan, was shot and killed by the first responding OSU police officer, and 13 people were hospitalized for injuries.
How about Bampumim Teixiera from Africa. This is from the Boston Herald:
The man charged today with the slaughters of two prominent doctors in their South Boston penthouse Friday night told a bank teller in 2014 “I’ll start shooting people” if she didn’t give him $1,000, according to court documents. Though no weapon was shown, the teller at Citizens Bank on Summer Street complied with Bampumim “JJ” Teixeira’s terrifying demand on Aug. 28, 2014, court records state.
Teixeira, 30, who was arrested for the crime last year by the FBI Bank Robbery Task Force while living at a Chelsea rooming house, was formally charged this morning (May 2017) with the murders of engaged anesthesiologists Drs. Richard Field and Lina Bolanos. It remains unclear when and where Teixeira will be arraigned. He remains hospitalized this morning with multiple gunshot wounds police say he suffered in a shootout when they tried to enter the couple’s Dorchester Avenue condo. No officers were hit.
Now look at what liberal judge Lisa Grant, a graduate of elite Wellesley College, (where Hillary Clinton went) did for this “dreamer” after the bank robbery, according to UPI.com:
Teixeira should have had his green card revoked and been deported. But Judge Grant intervened on the criminal’s behalf. According to court documents, Judge Grant deliberately reduced the number of days Teixeira would be committed to serve in a house of correction from 365 to 364. 365 days would trigger an automatic request for his deportation. So, Judge Grant tampered with and changed the court document, writing “364” over “365” days.
Or just one more from Breitbart News:
Angel mom Laura Wilkerson’s 18-year-old son Josh was killed by an illegal alien “dreamer” who came to the United States with his parents at 10-years-old and would likely have qualified under the once-touted Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill “DREAM Act” or DACA.
The average age of the “dreamers” is 25. Tens of thousands of them have committed crimes within the US from welfare fraud to Social Security fraud to drug dealing to bank robbery to assault to rape and murder, and on and on. More than 70% of all “dreamers” are estimated to be living on, or in households that are getting, “government assistance” (welfare, food stamps, etc.)
Thousands of violent MS-13 gang members could be considered “dreamers” after they have entered the US as “unaccompanied minors” or through open borders.
Liberals deceptively portray all “dreamers” as hard-working young people who want to go to college and become cancer researchers. This is baloney. Many of them will never work in their lifetimes. Living on “government assistance” suits them just fine. Don’t be fooled by the Democrats’ teary-eyed stage show.
Here is how Wikipedia describes the DACA program for “dreamers” that president Trump is going to scrap over the next six months:
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is an American Immigration policy founded by the Obama administration in June 2012. DACA allows certain illegal immigrants who entered the country as minors, to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and eligibility for a work permit.
The policy was created after acknowledgment that these students had been largely raised in the United States, and was seen as a way to remove immigration enforcement attention from “low priority” individuals with good behavior. The illegal immigrant student population was rapidly increasing; approximately 65,000 illegal immigrant students graduate from U.S. high schools on a yearly basis.
From the start, the Pew Research Center estimated that up to 1.7 million people might be eligible. As of June 2016, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had received 844,931 initial applications for DACA status, of which 741,546 (88%) were approved, 60,269 (7%) were denied, and 43,121 (5%) were pending. Over half of those accepted reside in California and Texas.
In November 2014, U.S. President Barack Obama attempted to expand DACA. However, in December 2014, Texas and 25 other states, all with Republican governors, sued in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas asking the court to enjoin implementation of both the DACA expansion and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (a similar program). In February 2015, Judge Andrew S. Hanen issued a preliminary Injunction blocking the expansion from going into effect while the case, Texas v. United State, proceeds. After progressing through the court system, an equally divided (4-4) Supreme Court left the injunction in place, without setting any precedent.
In other words Obama just made it up, and he knew, and admitted, that it was not legally binding. Republicans rightly called DACA an abuse of executive power and unconstitutional and it was blocked by judge Hanen. Trump is now officially repealing it.
Trump also is planning to enforce existing immigration law, which Obama was not doing even after DACA was blocked.
Good for president Trump. This is part of his strategy to reverse the idea that illegal immigration into the United States has no consequences.
We must stop this unlimited flow of illegal immigration; make it uncomfortable to be an illegal immigrant in order to discourage more illegal immigration; control our borders; and be selective about whom we allow to enter the country.
Meanwhile there is no possible way that president Trump can deport every illegal immigrant, or every “dreamer,” from the United States anyway, nor does he want to.
His real goal in eliminating DACA is part of his strategy to expel bad illegal immigrants and bad “dreamers” in order to discourage more illegal immigration. To do that he must play hardball and announce that he is going to fully enforce American law as written and implemented – that you can’t just come into America without doing it officially and legally.
He even is telling the Congress to formulate a law to protect legitimate “dreamers”. And you can rest assured that the congressional do-nothings who have blocked the president’s legislative every step of the way will come up with a DACA fix overnight after ignoring president Trump’s agenda to help Americans.
Nikitas3.com recommends: No new DACA. No protection for any illegals. First, build the wall and enforce all laws to stop illegal entry, including by air with visas that are permanently overstayed. Second, cut off “government assistance” for illegals; this alone will cause millions to leave the US and go back to their home country. Then let’s start by deporting the millions of bad illegals and bad “dreamers”. As soon as possible. Period. End of sentence.
Then after that, we can start to look at the rest of them on a case-by-case basis. Those who are not working, or who have no work history, or are not in school can go back to their home countries. We need to care for Americans first, particularly tens of millions of white Americans in rural and small-town USA who have been economically and socially marginalized for decades. We cannot afford to take care of the whole world. Remember that Obama’s aunt Zituni from Africa lived on welfare in public housing in Boston for 8 years after… get this… refusing to obey a deportation order in 2002.
President Trump is working to curb and reverse illegal immigration in another crucial way.
Nikitas3.com always predicted that president Trump’s crackdown on illegal aliens would come in stages.
We conservatives always knew that Trump would start with evil illegals like the MS-13 gang members whom he is starting to eject from the country right now. One recent report said that federal agents have rounded up 114 criminal foreign nationals in an 11-day sweep. Expect more of the same as long as president Trump is in office.
The second phase, Nikitas3.com predicted, would be the targeting of illegal immigrants in US prisons, of which there have been reported to be as many as 300,000.
Trump now appears ready to begin deporting the worst ones, but naturally he is facing opposition from lawyers and activists on the Democrat left who are doing everything in their power to stop him, as Democrats have been doing for more than 100 years.
The New York Times recently reported on the Trump crackdown in an article called Trump Administration Moves to Expand Deportation Dragnet to Jails. The Times article, by Caitlin Dickerson, is excerpted below with a Nikitas3.com comment after each excerpt:
Dickerson reports: The Trump administration is working with like-minded sheriffs from around the country on a plan to channel undocumented immigrants from local jails into federal detention, according to several sheriffs involved in the discussions. If it succeeds, it could vastly expand the dragnet that has already begun to transform immigration enforcement in the United States.
The plan is intended to circumvent court decisions that have thus far limited the role of local law enforcement in immigration. It involves a legal move regarding detainers, which are requests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to local sheriffs or police departments to hold people who are suspected of being in the country illegally, even after they have posted bail, finished their jail sentence or otherwise resolved their criminal cases.
A handful of sanctuary cities refuse to honor detainers on ideological grounds, but a larger number of sheriffs who otherwise support the Trump administration have also turned down detainers because courts have found that they violate the Fourth Amendment.
The legal move, in which sheriffs would essentially serve as contractors for ICE, is intended to protect sheriffs from such court battles, which have sometimes resulted in costly payouts. Some legal advocates for immigrants, though, expressed doubt that courts would view it as being different from current practices.
Nikitas3.com comment: OK, so here we go. President Trump simply wants to enforce American immigration law and liberals are fighting him. This is typical. Liberals have for many decades sided with criminals by using lenient judges, soft sentences, legal technicalities to get criminals off the hook, etc.
Yet Democrats have somehow convinced millions of Americans that they are the party of peace and justice. This is nonsense. Just look at the organized violence against Trump supporters, or the tsunami of illegal immigrant crime if you want to see how vicious the left really is.
Dickerson writes: The tactic would be a major step toward marrying local and federal law enforcement, a centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s plan to thwart illegal immigration and one that immigrant advocates have scrambled to block at every opportunity. If enough sheriffs participated, the approach could lead to many more immigration arrests, which have already risen more than 40 percent since last year.
Since Mr. Trump was inaugurated, ICE has issued roughly 11,000 detainers a month, a 78 percent increase over the previous year. The agency declined to make data available on the number of detainers that are currently declined by sheriffs and other local departments. Even under President Barack Obama, detainers created friction between ICE and sheriff’s departments because hundreds of them have policies against honoring the requests.
Nikitas3.com comment: Notice that the figure has risen 78% since the last year of Obama. This in itself shows how lax Obama was being, and why terrorist groups like MS-13 gang members were able to come to the US and stay here. It has been an intentional plan by Obama to disrupt America by flooding us with millions of illegal immigrants, many dependent and many of them very evil.
Dickerson reports: ICE issues detainers for roughly 1,000 people in his jail each year, (Minnesota) Sheriff Stanek said, and roughly two-thirds are ultimately freed before ICE agents can arrive to arrest them.
Nikitas3.com comment: Yes siree, almost 700 criminals were released every year under Obama in just one Minnesota jurisdiction alone. So if you wonder why we have a wave of illegal immigrant and “dreamer” crime, wonder no more. It is an intentional Obama/Democrat strategy to undermine America.
And now here is a quick word about a legal case from Utah that has been in the news recently:
A Salt Lake City hospital nurse was arrested July 26 for refusing to let a police officer draw blood from an unconscious car crash victim who had been brought into the hospital.
Naturally the media have stirred up national outrage against the police officer by portraying the case as a courageous, liberal nurse fighting the big, evil police department over basic human liberties.
But the nurse would lose her case in a fair and unbiased court proceeding. Here’s why:
She told the officer that hospital policy permits the police to draw blood from patients only if the patient consents; is under arrest; or when the officer has a warrant.
But even if that were all true, hospital policy is not the law and police can and do use special tactics when necessary.
For instance the officer in the Utah case needed to get evidence that the unconscious patient either was or was not driving drunk in order to clarify the circumstances of the crash and the charges to be filed.
The evidence of drunkenness, however, would have been lost over time as the alcohol naturally wore off, and thus the officer needed to get a blood sample as soon as possible.
So don’t let the media sway you against the police once again. There are always two sides to a story, but the media only tell the side that makes law enforcement look bad.
(Please bookmark this website and send this article by e-mail to your friends. And please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)