Flynn Guilty Plea Means Nothing/ Kate Steinle Verdict Blowback

One-time Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn has pled guilty to lying to the FBI.

The media are making this out to be the beginning of the end of Trump. It is not. Take it from This is a nothing-burger. This has been expected for a long time.

This is just another media assault on Trump, like all of the other failed assaults. Flynn only worked in the Trump administration for 24 days and then was fired for lying to vice president Pence. Flynn is a bad apple. This will do nothing to harm president Trump.

Look at this from Fox News for proof:

Though the individuals are not named, court documents show Flynn claiming a “very senior member” of the Trump transition team directed him to contact foreign governments including Russia over a United Nations vote – which was the subject of one of Flynn’s false statements.

Notice “Trump transition team” which was formed after Trump was elected, as ‘transition teams’ always are. But wasn’t the alleged “collusion” with Russia supposed to be during the campaign, before the election?

Yes. And wasn’t the alleged “collusion” supposed to be done to win the election? Yes. Yet the contact with the Russian government was after the election and concerned a United Nations vote. In other words, the contact was over a political issue that Trump was going to have to deal with as president.

Meanwhile even the Washington Post reported in January 2017 that Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador were innocuous.

Here’s more. ABC News tweeted:

JUST IN: @BrianRoss on @ABC News Special Report: Michael Flynn promised “full cooperation to the Mueller team” and is prepared to testify that as a candidate, Donald Trump “directed him to make contact with the Russians.”

Meanwhile ABC reports:

The special counsel charged that Flynn lied about not asking then-Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergei Kislyak to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions imposed by the Obama administration on December 29, 2016, and saying he did not recall that Kislyak told him Russia would moderate its response as a result.

It also charged that Flynn lied about asking Kislyak on December 22, 2016 to delay a vote on or defeat a pending United Nations Security Council resolution, and that Kislyak did not describe Russia’s response to the request.

OK, on December 22 and December 29, 2016, Trump was not a “candidate” as the ABC tweet says. He was “president elect”. See how these subtle things don’t add up? Update: Brian Ross of ABC issued an on-air “clarification” over this major and deceptive error.

And as president-elect he could direct his staff to contact anyone about anything so as to get his administration rolling in time for the inauguration. And he could not possibly be colluding to steal the election at that time after he had already won it.

Then remember The Big One: President Trump fired Flynn for lying to vice president Pence. And then remember that Michael Flynn is a Deep Stater who worked in the Obama administration.

Friends, this is all another fraud against Trump. Don’t give it a second thought. Now here is today’s main commentary:

For those left-wing advocates of open borders into the US, the ‘not guilty’ verdict in the Kate Steinle killing in San Francisco by an illegal immigrant may sound like a step forward. It is not. This verdict is outraging tens of millions of Americans and will lead to a harsher crackdown on illegal immigrants and so-called ‘sanctuary cities’. Good.

President Trump called the verdict “disgraceful” but that isn’t what he really thinks. guarantees that Trump is livid, and that this verdict is only going to fuel his crackdown. Good. Here is Fox News reporting about the case:

President Trump late Thursday tweeted that the not guilty verdict in the Kate Steinle murder trial was “disgraceful,” highlighting his apparent frustration at the resolution of a case he had cited during his presidential campaign as a justification for tougher immigration enforcement.

“A disgraceful verdict in the Kate Steinle case!” Trump tweeted after the jury rejected possible charges ranging from involuntary manslaughter to first-degree murder. “No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration.”

Jim Steinle, who was walking with his 32-year-old daughter when she was killed, echoed Trump’s sentiments, telling the San Francisco Chronicle the family was saddened and shocked by the verdict.

… A jury earlier Thursday found Jose Ines Garcia Zarate not guilty in Steinle’s killing on a San Francisco pier during the presidential primary campaign in 2015.

U.S. immigration officials said they will deport Garcia Zarate, who had been deported five times and was wanted for a sixth deportation when Steinle was fatally shot in the back while walking with her father.

Zarate also had seven felony convictions in the US and repeated illegal entries. In the Steinle case he shot an illegal gun at a tourist site in San Francisco. The bullet bounced off the pavement and killed Kate Steinle. Zarate should have been convicted at least of involuntary manslaughter.

Even before that he should have been in jail or deported long ago. But liberal law enforcement officials do not want bad people punished in order to cause chaos in America.

Illegal aliens and illegal alien criminals know that they are safe in liberal places like California and San Francisco… That is why they are going there.

President Trump tweeted:

The Kate Steinle killer came back and back over the weakly protected Obama border, always committing crimes and being violent, and yet this info was not used in court. His exoneration is a complete travesty of justice. BUILD THE WALL! — The jury was not told the killer of Kate was a 7 time felon. The Schumer/Pelosi Democrats are so weak on Crime that they will pay a big price in the 2018 and 2020 Elections.

Fantastic. This verdict is going to have long-lasting repercussions. Meanwhile there are millions of not-famous cases of illegals committing heinous crimes in the US. Even legal immigrants get in on the act, like the black legal immigrant from Africa who committed two bank robberies in Boston. The judge in the case Lisa Grant knew that the immigrant would be deported if he served a year or more in jail and so she reduced his sentence to 364 days. After the African was released from jail he murdered two doctors.

This is what we get when we allow people from “barbarian” cultures to come into our advanced nation. This inflow must end.

This Steinle case centers not just around the crime itself, but the refusal of law enforcement officials in “sanctuary city” San Francisco to cooperate with federal immigration officials. This allowed this seven-time felon and five-time deportee to escape federal detection and kill Kate Steinle. believes that those San Francisco officials should be subjected to civil legal action, and federal arrest for violating federal immigration law. Enough is enough.

Meanwhile the billionaire elites who support the New World Order, the Democrat party and unlimited immigration live in safe, gated communities and don’t worry about crime.

Attorney general Sessions is also angry about the Steinle verdict and we can expect him to take direct action. For many years, has looked forward to the day when conservative power could be used against illegal immigration and those who support it.

It gets worse. Look at this from Breitbart News:

Since San Francisco remains a sanctuary city that gives safe haven to criminal illegal aliens, ICE officials will have to know the exact date and time that local law enforcement will release the illegal alien in order to detain him and ultimately deport him.

Without knowledge of his release, ICE officials would have to use sources and evidence to track down Lopez-Sanchez before he moves around the U.S. to possibly avoid deportation.

In other words this barbarian will be released from custody to await sentencing on a lesser gun charge and will certainly flee. San Francisco officials will not tell federal officials when or where they are going to release him in order to protect him.

Do you see how grotesque this is? This is how liberals protect criminals. This is precisely why we have so much crime. If there were no liberals in the US, estimates that crime rates would fall 90%.

This Steinle verdict shows two things:

*It shows that juries in liberal places like San Francisco will “nullify” legal cases that they don’t agree with in order to protect criminals and illegal aliens. This barbarian should have been convicted at least of involuntary manslaughter, particularly since he already had seven felonies; and

*It shows that the Trump administration must step up mass arrests of illegal immigrants and also commence mass arrests of US law enforcement officials who are breaking federal law by refusing to cooperate with federal immigration officials.

This second outcome is the really important result that should come out of this horrible crime. The killing of Kate Steinle and then this verdict are what are known as a “triggering events” that are going to inspire a whole new era in immigration enforcement.

Now go here to read a September 1, 2016 editorial about candidate Trump’s bold talk about immigration. It is worth reading in light of the Steinle verdict.

(Please bookmark this website and send this article by e-mail to your friends. Please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.