Big Trump Win on 2020 Census/ More Black Eyes for FBI

President Trump just keeps winning and reforming the nation. John Binder at Breitbart News reports:

In a historic moment for President Trump’s administration, Commerce Department Secretary Wilbur Ross has announced that a question asking United States residents if they are American citizens will be placed on the 2020 Census.

… Since 1950, the citizenship question has not been asked on the full Census, leaving the nation without an exact estimate of how many citizens are in the country and how many noncitizens and illegal aliens are in the country.

This is a huge victory for those of us who want our national sovereignty protected and is part of president Trump’s plan to start to address the massive problem of illegal immigration.

Today congressional districts are drawn simply based on the number of people in each district. Not only are citizens and legal aliens counted in the census (taken every 10 years), but illegal aliens are counted too, i.e., when the census is taken, the question of citizenship is not asked.

That will now change and it only makes sense since illegal immigration is out of control.

There are 746,000 people in an average congressional district. But if, for example, half of a district (373,000 people) is made up of illegal aliens then there are only 373,000 US citizens in that district.

Those 373,000 US citizens then get one representative in the US Congress, the same representation as a district with no illegal aliens and 746,000 US citizens. In other words those 373,000 citizens in effect have twice the political power per person as the 746,000.

This gives states with large populations of illegal immigrants extra political power, including in the distribution of federal funds which is often based on population.

This shows clearly why Democrats want illegal immigration. Even if the illegals are not voting, their mere presence in the census increases political power for Democrat districts that harbor them – until the 2020 census change that is. That is why California and other liberal states are inviting illegals to settle there, even from other US states.

Another fact that terrifies Democrats is that we finally will find out how many illegals are in the US. Liberals do not want us to know the real number.

This deep-rooted problem needs to be addressed. President Trump is doing so with this census directive.

This is also why Democrats are so desperate to protect illegals in every way possible like never reporting on the massive crime wave being committed by illegals.

It is being reported that California could lose three or more US Congress seats when illegal aliens are not counted. California does not want this to happen and thus will fight the new census question mightily.

A Quick Thought about Guns

Gun-control activists repeatedly cite “peaceful Europe” as a place without violence.

Sadly, between 1900 and 1950 “peaceful Europe” saw 100 million citizens murdered in war and genocide. Hundreds of millions of survivors saw their lives and their prosperity destroyed by armed conflict while much of the continent was destroyed twice over in World War I and World War II.

This happened since the European people were never armed and able to fight back against their tyrannical governments. Hitler confiscated all of the guns of the German people except those who agreed with him.

America saw no such destruction. Meanwhile Americans have been moving over the last 50 years by the tens of millions into conservative states like Texas with the loosest gun laws.

At the same time millions of illegal immigrants are breaking down the door to get into the United States and then demanding to stay here even though we have an ostensibly dangerous 2nd Amendment, which no other nation has.

Here is the Nikitas3.com solution: Illegal aliens should leave America if they are afraid of the 2nd Amendment. American Liberals should leave too. Gun ownership is for a mature population that wants liberty and peace.

More Black Eyes for FBI

Our Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has become largely corrupt as it has been taken over by liberals. For instance it had been warned twice about the Florida high school killer but did nothing. It knew about the Boston Marathon bomber but did nothing about him and his brother. It had received many warnings about 9/11 but failed to act.

Director James Comey and his cronies were obviously involved in corruption at the highest levels of the FBI, particularly regarding Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. That is why president Trump fired Comey and why FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe has been fired.

Now CBS reports about the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre in Florida by extremist muslim Omar Mateen:

After the Pulse massacre, Seddique Mateen became an outspoken figure, condemning his son Omar Mateen’s actions …

(Seddique Mateen’s) name is in the headlines again today during the trial of (Omar) Mateen’s widow, Noor Salman, who is accused of knowing what her husband’s plot to shoot up the nightclub that would end up killing 49 people.

Federal prosecutors revealed in court that Seddique Mateen has been a confidential FBI informant “at various points” between January 2005 and June 2016, the month the shooting happened.

The revelation raises questions about what Seddique Mateen was doing for the FBI and what the bureau knew about Omar’s plan.

… “Certainly the FBI is going to have to answer questions about their source-handling in this case and whether the father might have known or should have known,” said Ron Hosko, a former assistant director of the FBI. “The days ahead should be interesting ones.”

This is extremely disturbing. Once again we have serious questions about the FBI. This is another mystery that needs to be explained. What is FBI hiding? What was Seddique Mateen really doing? Whom did he have contact with at FBI? What did FBI really know about Omar Mateen?

Here is how Wikipedia describes Omar Mateen’s interactions with FBI:

The FBI investigated (Omar) Mateen in May 2013 after he made “inflammatory” remarks while working as a security guard. Mateen had told his coworkers that his family was linked to al-Qaeda and that he had joined Hezbollah, both rivals of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and of one another. Mateen pledged allegiance to ISIL during his 2016 shooting. FBI Director James Comey commented on the contradictions within Mateen’s statements. The FBI interviewed Mateen twice after opening an investigation; in these interviews, Mateen admitted to making the statements but “explained that he said them in anger because his co-workers were teasing him.” After 10 months, the investigation was closed and Mateen determined not to be a threat. Mateen had been placed on a terrorist watch list while the investigation was under way, but he was removed from it afterwards.
Mateen came to the FBI’s attention again in July 2014, when he was linked to Moner Mohammad Abu Salha, an American who had traveled to Syria and committed a suicide bombing in late May 2014. The two had been acquainted and “attended the same mosque.” The investigation continued, but focused on Abu Salha rather than Mateen, law-enforcement officials told The Wall Street Journal.

So there you go… “placed on a terror watch list…” Amazing. One news report claims that Seddique Mateen even used his FBI informer status to get his son off the hook when questions were raised about his son’s radical political activities.

This would mean total corruption, i.e., that the elder Mateen may have ended up doing the opposite of what he was supposed to be doing – informing on terrorism.

We all know what has happened to the FBI. It is the same thing that has happened to our universities, the media, our courts, our universities, the arts, Hollywood, etc., i.e., the socialist left has infiltrated and is using FBI for political purposes.

More FBI Corruption

Fox News reports:

After he escaped from Al Qaeda in Syria, American photojournalist Matt Schrier investigated his own kidnapping and uncovered what he describes as a pattern of “betrayal” by FBI agents handling his case.

Schrier is now asking hard questions of former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who now leads the special counsel Russia probe, and former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by President Trump in May 2017.

“Not every FBI agent is bad. Some are very good people,” Schrier told Fox News. “But the ones that are bad need to be weeded out. And the ones who let them be bad, and who turn their head, need to be exposed.”

In an exclusive cable interview that first aired Monday … Schrier went in depth, sharing emails, financial records and formal letters of complaint, which backed up allegations that after he was taken hostage in 2012, the FBI monitored his accounts as Al Qaeda terrorists used his money to buy at least a dozen computers and tablets.

While he was tortured and held by al Nusra, the brutal Al Qaeda franchise in Syria, Schrier claimed the FBI put intelligence gathering ahead of his personal security, hoping to track the computers and tablets to learn more about Al Qaeda recruits and future plots. After his harrowing escape, Schrier started demanding answers from the FBI, which at the time of his kidnapping was led by Mueller.

Since his return to the U.S. in mid-2013, Schrier shared documents with Fox News and explained, “I faxed– I emailed them, probably between my mother and my father and me, between 50 and 100 complaints.”

Comey took over from Mueller in September 2013, and Schrier said the stonewalling continued. “I was emailing him questions. I was forwarding him all these emails. I was demanding answers from him,” Schrier said. “And I never got anything back.”

Indeed, this is the same Robert Mueller who now is pursuing president Trump like a rabid animal. Mediaite.com reports:

During his monologue Tuesday night, Sean Hannity took a moment to investigate the top Russia investigator, Robert Mueller.

“If we want law and order to rein in this country, if we want to be a constitutional republic, we’ve got to investigate the investigators,” Hannity began. “We’ve literally got to drain the swamp and sewer.”

The Fox News host then posed the question, “Who is Robert Mueller?”

“Everybody says, ‘He’s the greatest guy in the whole wide world. Just trust us!’” Hannity mocked Mueller’s defenders. “Well members of Congress, the mainstream media, they’ve been trying to convince you the special counsel – ‘he is beyond reproach.’ Sort of like climate change. ‘Oh, noobody disagrees with us. No scientist does.’ That’s not true either! ‘Mueller is the utmost man of integrity.’ Well, we’ve been doing some digging and we found some things you need to know about.”

Hannity then slammed the special counsel by saying his career “has been anything but impeccable” and invoked his handling of the Whitey Bulger case when Mueller served as Assistant U.S. Attorney in Boston back in the 80s, specifically when four men were wrongfully convicted of murder under his watch as an apparent coverup by the FBI for their mob boss informant.

“Robert Mueller was the U.S. attorney in charge while these men were rotting in prison while certain agents in the FBI under Mueller covered up the truth!” Hannity exclaimed.

Investigative journalist Sara Carter writes:

In Boston, Mueller was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office and then became the Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987.

It was Mueller’s actions during that time that raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit.

Local law enforcement officials, the media, and some colleagues criticized Mueller and the FBI for what they believed was the bureau’s role in covering up for the FBI’s longtime dealings with mobster and informant James “Whitey” Bulger.

Bulger was a kingpin and a confidential informant for the FBI from the 1970s in the bureau’s efforts to take down the Italian mafia in Boston. But Bulger’s relationship with his FBI handler Special Agent John Connolly became toxic. It was later discovered that Connolly went out of his way to protect Bulger and aided the crime boss against investigations being conducted by the Boston PD and the Massachusetts State Police. According to reports at the time, Connolly would inform Bulger of wiretaps and surveillance being conducted by law enforcement.

Journalist Kevin Cullen wrote extensively about the FBI’s involvement with Bulger and raised concerns about the old case in a 2011 article in Boston.com after Obama asked Congress to make an exception to allow Mueller to stay on two-extra years beyond the mandated 10 year limit as FBI director.

Cullen said in his story that Mueller who was first an assistant US attorney, “then as the acting US attorney in Boston” had written “letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset.”

In 2001, those four men, who were convicted in 1965 of Teddy Deegan’s murder were exonerated by the courts. It was discovered that the FBI withheld evidence from the court to protect their informant that would have cleared the men, according to reports. At the time, the bureau buried the truth to protect Vincent “Jimmy’’ Flemmi, their informant, who was the brother of Stevie Flemmi, a partner of Bulger.

(Please bookmark this website and send this article by e-mail to your friends. Please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!). Bookmark the permalink.