Trump Leads Global Movement Against Mass Migration

The political uprisings in Europe and the US against mass illegal immigration are being reflected in the election of Donald Trump and by the rise of secure-borders parties and political leaders in Europe.

Today president Trump is leading the charge against this migrant onslaught and his influence is spreading. That is why globalists are desperate to depose Trump in any way they can.

President Trump said this on Thanksgiving Day about the Mexican border as the migrant ‘caravan’ has appeared on America’s doorstep:

REPORTER: “Mr. President, what about the idea that the military may use lethal force against these migrants?”

TRUMP: “If they have to, they’re going to to use lethal force. I’ve given the OK. If they have to, I hope they don’t have to, but you’re dealing with a minimum of 500 serious criminals. So I’m not going to let the military be taken advantage of. I have no choice. Do I want that to happen? Absolutely not, but you’re dealing with rough people. You ask the people in Tijuana, Mexico, they opened up with wide arms, just come in, come in, let me help you, let us take care of you. And within two days, now they’re going crazy to get them out. They want them out. Because things are happening, bad things are happening in Tijuana. And again, it’s not in this country because we’ve closed it up. Actually, two days ago, we closed the border. We actually just closed it. We say nobody is coming in because it was out of control. But you take a look at Tijuana, Mexico. You see what’s happening there. It’s really a bad situation.”

REPORTER: “What do you mean you closed the border and nobody is coming in? What do you mean by that?”

TRUMP: “If we find that it’s uncontrollable, Josh, if we find that it’s — it gets to a level where we are going to lose control or where people are going to start getting hurt, we will close entry into the country for a period of time until we can get it under control.”

REPORTER: “Do you mean the entire border?” [crosstalk]

TRUMP: “The whole border. I mean the whole border. And Mexico will not be able to sell their cars into the United States where they make so many at great benefit to them — not a great benefit to us, by the way. But at least now we have a good new trade deal with Mexico and with Canada. But we will close the border. And that means that Mexico is not going to be able to sell their cars into the United States until it’s open. But we’re going to either have a border or we’re not. And when they lose control of the border on the Mexico side, we just close the border. And we have a very powerful border. We built a very strong border in a very short period of time. And the military has been fantastic, the job they have done. And by the way, Border Patrol and ICE, all of the law enforcement we have involved, and we have local law enforcement, too, they have done an incredible job. And they have wanted this for you know, I’m the first president who’s done to this extent, but they wanted this for years. And some of the presidents, I guess they didn’t care or they wanted open borders. I don’t think they wanted open borders. Because most of them, if you go back to 2006, they all approved essentially a wall, a very powerful fence, which is pretty much the same thing. But in 2006, if you look, Obama, you look at Hillary Clinton, you look at Schumer, all of the people that are standing up protesting, they think it’s good for them politically. See, I think it’s bad for them politically. I think the fact that they’re weak on the border is very, very bad for them politically. But you know, I have only been a politician for three years so maybe they know better than me.”

Fantastic. This is real leadership after illegal immigration has spun out of control for decades under both Republicans and Democrats since nobody had the courage to stand up to it. And if we do not stop this ‘caravan’, hundreds more will follow.

There obviously is financial backing flowing to these ‘caravans’ from hard-left sources in the US like George Soros. Otherwise the ‘caravans’ would not be able to proceed.

Update: Fox News reports:

The Trump administration has reportedly made a deal with Mexico’s incoming government to require all asylum-seekers coming from the south of the border to wait in Mexico while their asylum claims go through court.

The Washington Post, citing Mexican officials and senior members of president-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s transition team, reported Saturday that the Remain in Mexico plan would require asylum applicants to stay in Mexico, therefore ending the “catch-and-release” practice whereby those seeking asylum are allowed to stay in the U.S.

Should the policy be implemented, it would mark a significant victory for President Trump, whose tough immigration stance — including his promises to end catch-and-release and build a wall — has formed a central part of his political platform both before and after his election.

Meanwhile Hillary Clinton recently warned about open borders, not because of the devastating consequences of mass immigration for Europe and the US, including the flow of illegal drugs, but because mass migration is harming her party and parties like it in Europe. Fox News reported:

Hillary Clinton has issued frank advice to European leaders: If you want to stop the rise of rightwing populists then get a handle on your immigration crisis.

Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, said during an interview with The Guardian, that the one million migrants and refugees that have flooded into the European Union since 2015 have thrust immigration into the spotlight and fueled the rise of hardline leaders around the globe. And while she praised German chancellor Angela Merkel for her compassion, she cautioned that countries can’t leave the door open forever.

“I think Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame,” Clinton said regarding the rise of rightwing populists like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán.

Clinton added: “I admire the very generous and compassionate approaches that were taken particularly by leaders like Angela Merkel, but I think it is fair to say Europe has done its part, and must send a very clear message – ‘we are not going to be able to continue provide refuge and support’ – because if we don’t deal with the migration issue it will continue to roil the body politic.”

Oh, no kidding? In other words, Hillary only sees illegal immigration in light of how it harms her ideology. This is disgusting but understandable as her ideology takes blow after blow, like the election of president Trump.

Globalist German chancellor Angela Merkel has seen her high political stature collapse on the issue of immigration after she allowed more than 1 million muslims into Germany in 2015. The crime, violence and terrorism of these migrants have shocked her nation and rocked her leadership.

Update: Merkel, who has portrayed herself for years as a “conservative”, said this as reported on The Express website from Britain:

Mrs Merkel, who last month announced she was controversially stepping down as leader of her party but not as Chancellor of Germany despite previously saying the two roles go hand in glove, said ceding power to a superstate is a better form of patriotism.

She told the event, titled ‘Parliamentarianism Between Globalisation and National Sovereignty’: “In this day nation states must today – should today, I say – be ready to give up sovereignty.

“But of course in an orderly procedure.”

Mrs Merkel said that countries who think “they can solve everything on their own” are simply nationalistic and not patriotic because they “only think about themselves.”

Wow. Frightening… Meanwhile Democrats in the US have exploited illegal immigration to selectively admit immigrants whom they support and to discriminate against people who genuinely need our help.

In Obama’s last two years in office tens of thousands of Middle East migrants were allowed to enter the US from Syria that were made up of less than 1% displaced Christians and more than 99% muslim. Yet it is Christians who are the real victims of the muslim violence in Syria, and in Iraq.

These Christians are truly the people who need our asylum policies and who should benefit from them and be allowed to enter the US for asylum. They are being brazenly targeted in Syria and Iraq and are good people who will add to our country, not detract from it the way so many muslim immigrants have.

Meanwhile notice that wealthy oil-rich nations are accepting zero muslim immigrants from Syria. Why not?

Because they know that they cannot handle them and do not want to share any of their wealth with them.

At the same time a female muslim immigrant who was just elected to the US Congress from Minnesota allegedly committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother, but the media have covered up the story, although the conservative media have offered proof. She is a Democrat, of course.

This shows once again that many muslims do not want to assimilate into the United States. We have known this since 9/11.

Nikitas3.com has asked the question many times: If islam is so superior to Christianity, as muslims claim, then why are millions of muslims desperate to come to the Christian West?

Answer: Because islamic nations, except those that happen to be sitting on pools of oil like Saudi Arabia, are dark, backward, poor, oppressed and violent. Women are treated horribly. In short islam has never provided its people with the material needs of life; religion is not enough when the people are suffering.

After years of heavy immigration – decades in the US – hundreds of millions of people in Europe and the United States are fed up and are openly supporting policies for strong borders.

And if President Trump has to ban immigrants from certain nations and shut down the entire Mexican border then that is fine. That means that nothing will be allowed to go either way over the border including legal trade, travel and tourism.

This shutdown will strangle the Mexican economy and Mexico knows it. This will particularly hurt the Mexican tourist economy at the height of the Winter tourist season.

Mexico has been aiding and abetting illegal immigration for decades and sending their poor citizens to the US. It is time to demand that Mexico shut off the flow.

Nations have shut down their borders myriad times throughout history, including the US. Newsweek.com reports:

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush had the southern border partially closed and ordered full inspections of all incoming vehicles and pedestrians.

President Ronald Reagan also closed ports of entry along the border in 1985 temporarily, after the kidnapping and murder of a Drug Enforcement Administration agent in Mexico.

After the 1985 shutdown Mexico quickly cooperated and found the body of the DEA agent, and apprehended his killers. This shows that closing the border is an effective tool; Mexico needs access to the US market more than the US needs access to Mexico.

Nikitas3.com believes that president Trump is going to win re-election in 2020 with his tough stance on the border, and that his opponent is going to offer a “compassionate” open-border policy that will lose the election.

There is more good news. Breitbart News recently reported about growing opposition in Europe to mass migration:

More nations are joining the exodus from the United Nations’ (UN) controversial compact on mass migration, with legal experts now standing up to raise concerns about the drafting of the document and what legal implications signing it might have for countries party to the pact.

President Donald Trump was the first to pull out of the UN pact on migration in December 2017, a move which prompted howls of disapproval from both the mainstream media and globalist leaders.

Yet several nations from all over the world have outright withdrawn from the compact since initially ratifying it in July, or have signalled their intent to do so, as states gain confidence in opposing fashionable but dangerous deals that are not in their own interests.

OK, great. And this is happening because president Trump is leading the way and encouraging the world to act. Here are more excerpts from Breitbart News, with a Nikitas3.com comment after each:

Breitbart News reports: In comments that cut across the grain of the usual business and practice of the United Nations, President Trump said at the body’s New York headquarters in September: “Migration should not be governed by an international body unaccountable to our own citizens.

“Ultimately, the only long-term solution to the migration crisis is to help people build more hopeful futures in their home countries. Make their countries great again.”

Nikitas3.com comment: Correct. One of the primary drivers of the current wave of migration from the Middle East was the failure of Obama to stop the terrorists who were fueling the war in Syria. This led to years of destruction and hundreds of billions in damage in Syria, and tens of thousands of lives lost – all preventable.

President Trump ended that war in one year by obliterating the terrorist with US military airstrikes. They either were killed by the thousands or they went home in defeat.

Obama could have done the same thing years before, but he did not. He wanted the terrorists to win and the wave of out-migration to the US and Europe to continue.

Even the violence and war that have plagued Iraq have been a result of muslim terrorism in response to Bush’s war to liberate the people from the tyrannical dictator Saddam Hussein.

Iraq and Syria can be rebuilt using Middle Eastern oil money, no problem. It is time to start rebuilding.

Breitbart News reports: Australia, Israel, and Poland are among the latest to pull out (of the United Nations compact on migration) all citing national interest reasons.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morris remarked Wednesday that the agreement is “inconsistent” with his nation’s best interest, and that the document “fails to adequately distinguish between people who enter Australia illegally and those who come to Australia the right way”, noting the frequent observation that the paper does not differentiate between legal and illegal migration.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also alluded to the document’s ambiguity on illegal migrants, saying Tuesday that: “We are committed to guarding our borders against illegal migrants. This is what we have done, and this is what we will continue to do,” reports the Jerusalem Post.

Switzerland is now postponing a decision on signing the deal, and the nation’s parliament will debate the issue in the coming weeks.

These announcements followed by several days other similar messages from European nations Poland and Austria, who in turn stated their opposition to the document which both emphasises the “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” nature of massive movements of people, and calls on signatories to “prevent” campaigning against mass migration in “the context of electoral campaigns”.

Nikitas3.com comment: These nations are balking after they have seen mass violence committed by muslim immigrants in places like Sweden, Britain and Paris, stories that that the left-wing media in Europe are suppressing.

Breitbart News reports: Poland’s Interior Minister Joachim Brudzinski said in October that: “the draft of the agreement does not contain adequately strong guarantees of [nations’] sovereign right to decide who comes into their territory and [nor does it] distinguish legal and illegal migration”.

“We want Poles to be safe in their country.”

Hungary, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Croatia … have also signalled alarm … (and) pulled out.

Nikitas3.com comment: This is correct. Sovereignty, or the ability of a nation to control its own destiny, is the real issue here. If a nation cannot even control its own borders, it has no sovereignty.

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!). Bookmark the permalink.