Eight Democrats already have declared that they will run for president in 2020. Nikitas3.com predicts that the Democrat field will expand to as many as 25 candidates by January 2020.
This growing field is a result of the media hatred of and caricature of president Trump which has given many Democrats the impression that they can easily beat him.
They also believe that being president does not require any intelligence or hard work, that the presidency is a glamorous Democrat caretaker position to maintain the Deep State status quo through adoring Fake News media coverage.
Nikitas3.com predicts that Trump will win re-election over any of these Democrats since the president has kept his promises, has made many tough decisions (on trade, North Korea, taxes, the border, annihilating ISIS terrorists, etc.), has improved the economy (which is the most important issue for most voters) and that he will probably face an extremist Democrat who cannot win anyway.
Nikitas3.com also predicts a great deal of bickering in a fractured Democrat primary season, which will help Trump.
President Trump already is acting like a candidate. He recently tweeted that “Democrats are becoming the Party of late term abortion, high taxes, Open Borders and Crime!” That is direct and powerful stuff that we have rarely seen before in American politics. And he is just getting started; just wait to see what he does during the election season in 2020. He is going to campaign forcefully and vocally, with no holds barred.
He also said recently that Democrat House speaker Nancy Pelosi is “very bad for our country” and “doesn’t mind human trafficking” at the border.
Wow. Kaboom. This is very strong language. This type of bold rhetoric is going to help Trump to win re-election.
With the Fake News media 100% against Trump you would think that Democrats could come up with some winning candidates but they seem to be stuck with a bunch of militants, wackos and no-names with outlandish ideas.
The first and foremost Democrat clown candidate is US senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts whose personal saga just keeps going downhill. Nikitas3.com predicts that her chances of being elected president are zero.
‘Pocahontas’ just can’t shake her Original Sin which was to claim that she was somehow part Native American. Warren recently sought to undo some of the damage by taking a DNA test that showed her to possibly be .001% Native American. Fox News reported:
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren has apologized to the Cherokee Nation for taking a DNA test to prove she had Native-American ancestry, taking a step to smooth over the lingering controversy as she prepares to formally launch her 2020 presidential campaign.
“Senator Warren has reached out to us and has apologized to the tribe. We are encouraged by this dialogue and understanding that being a Cherokee Nation tribal citizen is rooted in centuries of culture and laws, not through DNA tests,” Cherokee Nation spokeswoman Julie Hubbard said in a statement.
The October DNA test by the Massachusetts senator angered some tribal leaders and sparked plenty of political pushback against the senator at the time.
The New York Times and The Intercept first reported the apology, a break from Warren’s past reluctance to issue one. But the Times reported Warren privately expressed concern she may have hurt her standing with Native-American groups and her own supporters in her handling of the test.
“We are encouraged by her action and hope that the slurs and mockery of tribal citizens and Indian history and heritage will now come to an end,” Hubbard added.
The move comes just over a week before Warren is expected to formally declare her candidacy for president, after having launched an exploratory committee. On Thursday, her campaign teased that Warren would have an announcement on Feb. 9.
Warren is basically an idiot, and coming from Massachusetts, where Nikitas3.com is headquartered, this is no surprise; she is your average Massachusetts Democrat. If you have not personally experienced these people, you have no idea how ignorant, arrogant, shameless and corrupt they are.
This DNA test was yet another disaster for Warren. She is going to remain a political joke for the next century. If she were by any chance to become the 2020 nominee president Trump would shred her. Democrats know this. That is why she will never win the primary, predicts Nikitas3.com. Her fellow Democrats are going to shred her first.
Another Democrat who has announced that he will run in 2020 is black US senator Cory Booker of New Jersey. Booker seriously embarrassed himself during the Kavanaugh hearings by comparing himself to Spartacus, the 1st century BC leader of a Roman slave revolt.
This is bad enough but now Booker has made this statement: “The biggest threat, the cancer in many ways in our country right now is a caustic type of politics that wants to pit us against each other and create the illusion of separateness.”
This is obviously a reference to president Trump but apparently Spartacus has not been paying attention to the vicious hatred being promoted every minute of every day by the Democrat party and its media friends against white people, Republicans, pro-lifers, conservatives and president Trump. Or the tidal wave of crime being committed against white people by blacks. Or the destruction of trillions of dollars in property values when blacks move into stable white neighborhoods and ruin them, as has happened in Nikitas3.com’s boyhood hometown.
But, hey, Booker is black. He does not look in the mirror. As far as he is concerned all of the problems of blacks are caused by whites and not by failure within the black community.
Booker rose to national prominence as the mayor of the failed city of Newark, New Jersey, which is near New York City. It is a largely black, poor, crime-ridden city. It has been called “the carjacking capital of America”. The Independent website reported in September 2016:
Dubbed a “business necessity” rather than a leisure destination, Newark in New Jersey, US, has landed the top spot as the world’s least friendly city.
Newark’s “extreme traffic and poor signage” have been cited as reasons for the city’s lack of congeniality, while its status as an airport city is said to make it crowded and overpriced.
One disappointed traveller recently said Newark was “one of the saddest looking cities” they had ever seen.
And Booker wants to be president? Is he kidding? Running on this record? Trump will shred him too. Look at what Booker said about his youth:
“When I was a baby, my parents tried to move us into a neighborhood with great public schools, but Realtors wouldn’t sell us a home because of the color of our skin. A group of white lawyers, who had watched the courage of civil rights activists, were inspired to help black families in their own community, including mine. And they changed the course of my entire life. Because in America, courage is contagious.”
So what is wrong with this?
Well, first, he intentionally fails to mention that his parents wanted to move into a “white” neighborhood. Second, notice that Booker’s parents wanted to move to a white neighborhood as soon as they could afford to, as millions of blacks do.
And this raises the question: Why don’t successful blacks stay in black neighborhoods and work to improve them? Isn’t the migration of successful blacks out of black neighborhoods and into white neighborhoods draining talent from and contributing to continued decline in those black neighborhoods?
Yes. Despite their avowed hatred of ‘privileged’ white people blacks usually want to live in white neighborhoods and enjoy white order and prosperity when they can afford to. After all, it is infinitely easier to move out of bad black neighborhoods than to try to fix them.
We have seen this same phenomenon over the last 50 years as tens of millions of liberals have run away from failing liberal states like New York, New Jersey, California, Illinois and Massachusetts and have fled to conservative states like Texas, Georgia and Florida to have better lives. But they can never admit what they are really doing.
Booker fancies himself as The New Obama. And he certainly would lead like Obama – he would lead America straight downhill into a Newark-like desolation.
Booker is not married. He is believed by many to be a homosexual although he denies it.
It gets worse. Here is Booker questioning Neomi Rao, who has been nominated by president Trump to the DC Court of Appeals:
“Have you ever had any LGBTQ law clerks?” Booker asked.
Rao responded: “Senator, I’ve yet to be a judge. I don’t have law clerks.”
So dumb-ass Booker apparently didn’t know that she was seeking to become a judge. Then Spartacus continued, that he meant to ask if she ever has had anyone working for her who is gay, bisexual, etc. Rao is currently the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a position described as the Trump administration’s “deregulatory czar.”
And Rao responded. “To be honest I don’t know the sexual orientation of my staff. I take people as they come, irrespective of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation. I treat people as individuals.”
And that is a great answer that puts a moron like Booker in his place.
Meanwhile the white homosexual mayor of the dreary post-industrial city of South Bend, Indiana, is also going to run for president. But Peter Buttigieg has an unfortunate name for a gay candidate; it will be used against him.
Buttigieg has little to show for his political career. South Bend remains a decrepit place. Buttigieg hasn’t done much for South Bend except to use it as a stepping-stone to a presidential run, as Booker is doing with Newark. This is how your average Democrat operates – style over substance.
It gets worse. Buttigieg is a far-leftist who wants Medicare-for-All, which is really ‘free’ government-run health care that would destroy Medicare by dispersing its funding among a larger and larger population.
Even worse Buttigieg is speaking openly about eliminating the Electoral College. This is the type of tampering with the basics of the Constitution that should eliminate this guy right away.
Another announced candidate is US senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York state. She is not well known and she has a surprisingly conservative past. She represented a relatively conservative and rural Upstate New York state district in the US House of Representatives for one term (2007-2009) before being appointed a senator in 2009 (she was re-elected a senator in 2012 and 2018).
Here is Wikipedia talking about Gillibrand, who was born to Democrat parents in Albany, New York. She went on to earn a law degree at UCLA:
Gillibrand’s tenure at (the New York City law firm) Davis Polk included serving as a defense attorney for tobacco company Philip Morris during major litigation, including both civil lawsuits and US Justice Department criminal and civil racketeering and perjury probes. As a junior associate in the mid-1990s, Gillibrand helped defend the company’s executives against a criminal investigation into whether they had committed perjury in their testimony before Congress when they claimed that they had no knowledge of a connection between tobacco smoking and cancer.
Wikipedia also reported about Gillibrand:
… Upon taking office (as a congresswoman in 2007) Gillibrand joined the Blue Dog Coalition, a group of moderate to conservative Democrats. She was noted for voting against the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, citing concerns regarding insufficient oversight and excessive earmarks. She opposed New York’s plans to issue driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants and voted in favor of legislation that would withhold federal funds from immigrant sanctuary cities. Gillibrand supported civil unions for same-sex couples, voted for a bill that limited information-sharing between federal agencies about firearm purchasers, and received a 100 percent rating from the National Rifle Association.
Thus while Gillibrand has certainly moved to the left along with the Democrat party during her US Senate career Nikitas3.com believes that her conservative record might have helped her in the past with a presidential run.
But that record will harm her among today’s radical Democrats. She also is white, straight and married, and those are strikes against her for a 2020 presidential nomination.
A very dark-horse Democrat candidate is Andrew Yang, who is an entrepreneur. He wants a basic universal income for all Americans, which is a far-left position. He is of Chinese descent. His parents were immigrants from the island of Taiwan, which is the free part of China.
Yang lives in New York City with his wife and two children. He is a graduate of Brown University and Columbia Law School. Here is how Wikipedia describes his company:
… Yang began to conceive his new company, Venture for America, a non-profit, which he founded in 2011 with the mission “to create economic opportunity in American cities by mobilizing the next generation of entrepreneurs and equipping them with the skills and resources they need to create jobs.”
Venture for America launched in 2011 with $200,000 and sent 40 top graduates to five U.S. cities… The strategy for the company was to recruit the nation’s top college graduates into a two-year fellowship program where they would work for and apprentice at promising startups in developing cities across the United States. The inspiration for Venture for America as outlined in Yang’s book, Smart People Should Build Things, argues that the top universities in the country cherry pick the smartest kids out of small towns and funnel them into the same corporate jobs in the same big cities. Yang’s goal, he outlines, is to help distribute that talent around the country and incentivize entrepreneurship for economic growth.
This all sounds good but it looks like just more Democrat pie-in-the-sky.
Another left-winger named Julian Castro has announced that he will run in 2020. Castro (no relation to the Cuban Castros) worked as secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the Obama administration. He also has been mayor of San Antonio, Texas. He is 44 years old. He has a twin brother who is a Democrat US congressman from Texas.
The Castro brothers graduated from Stanford University and Harvard Law School. UPI.com reports:
In his campaign announcement speech, Castro supported a number of progressive ideas, including Medicare for all and the so-called Green New Deal … to get the United States to 100 percent renewable energy. He promised to rejoin the Paris Agreement on climate change and invest in environmentally friendly practices.
In other words, this guy is another far-left hispanic. Nikitas3.com believes that he is far too young to run for president and should wait 20 years to do so.
Perhaps the most interesting entrant in the 2020 campaign is the very liberal founder of Starbucks, Howard Schultz (net worth is $3.3 billion. Trump is more than $4 billion). Schultz started out life poor in Brooklyn, New York and has praised the American economic system for giving him a chance to be somebody important. This immediately alienated Democrats who want to hear no praise of America.
Schultz said that he may run as an independent, but that ignited a firestorm among Democrats who think that his generally liberal positions would draw votes away from the Democrat candidate in 2020 and give the election to president Trump. Newsmax reported:
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz is telling advisers he is shocked by the backlash from Democrats to his announcement that he is seriously considering running for president as an independent in 2020, Fox Business Network reports.
As a result, he is now looking more closely at whether he wants to follow through with a possible White House bid, the network’s Charlie Gasparino reported.
A source described Schultz as being “surprised” by the severity of the Democratic reaction, while another said it left him “freaking out.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., had attacked Schultz saying billionaires who want to run for president should work their way up, perhaps by starting with a bid for city council.
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, said: “Anyone who would run as an independent, and clearly split the Democratic vote, and clearly help Donald Trump — that would be a terrible decision,”
And protesters interrupted Schultz several times during the first stop of his national book tour in New York City.
A senior adviser to Schultz told Fox Business that he will not officially decide on whether to enter the race until this summer.
Schultz obviously does not understand politics if he did not see this anger coming. This reaction will probably scare him off from his independent bid, or induce him to run as a Democrat if he runs at all.
Schultz had said the reason behind his potential third-party candidacy was that he believes that politics has become too polarized. This is correct; the only thing that he failed to mention is that the increasingly militant Democrat party is the single most polarizing force in American politics today.