Sex changers – with male-to-female changing much more common than vice versa – are just a tiny fraction of 1% of the population but they are causing major disruption.
This is typical of how liberals use small and demanding minority groups to sow social discord.
One of the main points of friction happens when male-to-female sex changers use ladies’ bathrooms since that is their “chosen” sex. Their presence in the bathrooms can be terrifying for women, particularly for young girls.
There have even been cases where men have simply gone into women’s bathrooms because they feel like it. And liberals are defending them! Here is frightening news from California from the Capoliticalreview.com reporting in 2015:
“On August 24, Michelle (not her real name) was with her 12-year-old daughter and her daughter’s 10-year-old friend at the REI sporting goods store in Santa Rosa (California). Upon leaving the store, Michelle noticed that the girls were upset. When asked, the girls stated that a man had come into the store restroom while they were using it. Michelle, who advocates for victim’s rights and knows that it only takes seconds for girls to be molested, returned to the store to notify management of the safety and privacy concerns. To her surprise, a store manager stated that they do not decide who people are or what they can do, and Michelle’s concerns were interpreted as being anti-LGBT. Michelle was then asked to leave the store, and obscenities were hurled by other patrons at her family as they drove out of the parking lot.”
This is how the communists and their pervert friends are seeking to destroy our public decorum. We also are seeing male-to-females accessing women’s locker rooms and shower facilities and demanding that they be allowed.
It is important to note that sex changers are simply homosexuals who want to take their dysphoria a giant step further. And like homosexuals sex changers have significantly elevated levels of suicide, depression, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, disease, early death and mental disorders.
But now the progressives are seeking to normalize sex changing and to marginalize anyone who challenges it.
For instance anyone who protests male-turned-female athletes competing against women and girls is publicly impugned by the sex-changer culture. Lesbian tennis star Martina Navratilova has been hit hard with widespread criticism over her statements defending women’s sports against the sex changers.
Women are finding that the men-turned-women can easily and obviously beat biological women at running, wrestling, cycling, etc. So there is little or no chance for biological women to win such competitions. This affects biological women’s abilities to attain recognition and even to get college admissions and scholarships based on their athletic abilities.
The issue is filtering down further and further into our schools. Tyler O’Neil at PJ Media wrote:
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to take up the important case Doe v. Boyertown Area School District, which centered on the question of whether or not students have the privacy right to sex-segregated bathrooms and locker rooms. Boys were shocked to find a girl changing with them and teenage girl Alexis Lightcap was terrified to a find a boy in her restroom. These violations of privacy were justified in the name of transgender inclusion. While the Supreme Court did not take up Lightcap’s case, it may consider similar ones coming down the pike.
“Students struggling with their beliefs about gender need compassionate support, but sound reasons based on common sense have always existed for schools to separate male and female teenagers in showers, restrooms, and locker rooms,” John Bursch, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, the firm representing Lightcap, said in a statement. “No student’s recognized right to bodily privacy should be made contingent on what other students believe about their own gender.”
OK, first of all this statement that “Students struggling with their beliefs about gender need compassionate support” is very suspect. This ‘struggle’ has only developed as the militants on the political left have normalized sex-changing in recent years. We weren’t even talking about it 10 years ago. Tens of thousands of sex changers across the nation would not be doing it without a model being set forth and mainstreamed by the progressives. PJ Media continued:
The Boyertown Area School District secretly implemented the pro-transgender policy during the 2016-2017 school year. Boys discovered a girl changing in their locker room. Embarrassed and confused, they sought help from school officials, who told them they should just “tolerate it” and “make it as natural as possible.” One of the male students left the school as a result of the policy. Lightcap encountered a boy in her restroom. Shocked and afraid, she fled the restroom, but school officials rejected her privacy concerns.
In other words kids are going about their daily routine as they have for thousands of years but they are now expected to put up with this type of disruption and confrontation. PJ Media continued:
The lawsuit, Doe v. Boyertown, argues the school is violating its students’ fundamental right to bodily privacy under the Constitution and effectively denying them access to locker room and restroom facilities on the basis of sex under Title IX.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the school, and ADF had appealed the case to the Supreme Court.
“Because the 3rd Circuit’s decision made a mess of bodily privacy and Title IX principles, we believe the Supreme Court should have reviewed it,” Bursch said. “But we hope the court will take up a similar case in the future to bring much-needed clarity to how the lower courts should handle violations of well-established student privacy rights.”
Yes, the Democrats love to scream about “privacy” when a woman wants an abortion. But when a lady or a young girl want privacy in a bathroom, locker room or shower room the same Democrats say that there is none. It is shocking.
Nikitas3.com believes that president Trump is going to make this an issue in the 2020 election and that it is going to be a big plus for Trump.
London is Deteriorating Under its Muslim Mayor
London has deteriorated significantly under its first muslim mayor Sadiq Khan. He was born in Britain to Pakistani immigrant parents and elected mayor in Spring 2016 at the age of 45.
This deterioration is no surprise. Khan is a pro-islam extremist and so he does not care about the general good of the city but only about elevating the status of muslims in the city. On the anniversary of Khan’s third year in office a conservative group issued a report about London. Infowars.com reported:
Sadiq Khan has presided over an “alarming hike in violent crime” in the three years since he has become London mayor, according to analysis by the Greater London Assembly Conservatives.
Published to coincide with the anniversary of Mayor Khan’s third year in office, the report, The Cost of Khan, revealed what the Conservative authors described as a legacy of mayoralty “defined by financial incompetence, a raft of broken promises, and a lack of delivery for Londoners” on issues including housing, transport, and law and order.
This is no surprise. Just look at the horrible state of most islamic countries and of muslim areas in very liberal European cities like London and Paris after a big muslim influx. The police won’t even go into these dangerous and crime-ridden areas. Infowars.com continued:
According to analysis conducted by the LGA Conservatives, under Mayor Khan knife crime has risen by 52 per cent, robbery by 59 per cent, and gun crime by 30 per cent.
“Latest crime statistics paint a damaging picture of Sadiq Khan’s record,” the report reads. “There has been a 24 per cent increase in homicides since 2016 and the 2018 homicide figure (135) is the highest since 2008.
“Between 2015/16 and 2018/19, knife crime has increased by 52.3 per cent, residential burglary has increased by 36.9 per cent and robbery has increased by 59.3 per cent. The figures speak for themselves.”
Wow. We conservatives warned about this. And all we need to do is look at how leftists are ruining American cities like San Francisco, a once storied metropolis that now has a reputation as a dirty city full of filthy, aggressive, drug-addicted homeless who use the streets as bathrooms. Ditto Seattle, New York and Los Angeles.
Meanwhile The New York Post reported in April 2018:
Londoners are alarmed that their city has seen more murders over the past two months than New York City — as police (in Britain) deal with a surge in knife crime, according to reports.
In February and March, 37 people were killed in London, compared to 35 in (New York), according to the Sunday Times.
Now local pols are even looking to New York’s (police) for crime-fighting inspiration.
To show how radical Khan is The Daily Mail reported this just before Khan was elected mayor:
All eyes were on the coffin as the pallbearers made their way to the hearse. The old lady had been popular, and Balham Mosque was thronging with mourners paying their last respects.
Helping to carry the casket on its final journey was Sadiq Khan, the local Labour MP and now hot favourite to succeed Boris Johnson as Mayor of London, one of the most powerful and influential jobs in the country. With the funeral formalities out of the way, Khan switched effortlessly back into professional politician mode, working his way through the crowd in South London.
One figure whose hand he stopped to shake stood out: convicted terrorist Babar Ahmad, a man who has been blamed for inspiring a generation of extremists, including the gang behind the London bombings of July 7, 2005. The pair exchanged brief pleasantries before Khan moved on.
The encounter took place a few months ago, around the time of Khan’s nomination as Labour’s mayoral candidate. Since then, riding on the crest of Jeremy Corbyn’s Leftist takeover of the Labour Party, Khan — the London-born son of Pakistani immigrants — has left Conservative mayoral candidate Zac Goldsmith trailing in his wake.
However, in recent weeks, a catalogue of troubling stories about his dealings with Islamic extremists have raised serious questions about his suitability for such a job.
New revelations this weekend — about how Khan shared a platform with Yasser al-Siri, a convicted terrorist and associate of hate preacher Abu Qatada, and Sajeel Shahid, a militant who helped to train the ringleader of the London bombings — are the most serious so far.
And as his fleeting meeting with Babar Ahmad at the funeral shows, Sadiq Khan’s interactions with controversial characters are not — as his spin doctors suggest — all in the past. Furthermore, it transpires that the MP for Tooting is a divisive character in his South London community, with dark allegations of threats and betrayal in his own political backyard.
Until his surprise triumph over Labour’s popular former Culture Secretary Dame Tessa Jowell for the mayoral nomination, Khan was a little-known figure outside Westminster. The son of a bus driver and a seamstress who, as he has put it, ‘worked all the hours God sent’, he never quite made it to the political premier league during Labour’s years in power. Few colleagues considered him a potential star.
After giving up his job as a human rights lawyer to become an MP in 2005, he had a series of ministerial roles, but never reached the Cabinet. As a result, he was spared intense media scrutiny.
Now he is in the full glare of the spotlight — and it has not always been flattering. Earlier this month, it emerged that his parliamentary assistant posted a series of highly offensive homophobic and misogynistic messages online.
Shueb Salar also posed for photos with guns. Amid embarrassment, Khan accepted his resignation.
The episode was a setback for the smooth-talking and ferociously ambitious Khan. It came hot on the heels of toxic revelations that he ‘followed’ two Isis supporters on Twitter. One posted links to propaganda videos; the other is the brother of a man convicted of supporting insurgents in Afghanistan.
Khan — who follows more than 7,300 people on Twitter — protested that it was ‘a bit desperate’ to single out two. His problem is that it reinforced the impression he is at best careless about the type of people who surround him; at worst, condones reprehensible views and behaviour.
Khan’s troubling connections start very close to home — with his former brother-in-law, Makbool Javaid, who had links with the extremist group Al-Muhajiroun, an organisation that praised the 9/11 attacks and the 7/7 bombings.
In the Nineties, when he was married to Khan’s sister Farhat, Javaid appeared at London events alongside some of the country’s most notorious hate preachers, including the now banned cleric Omar Bakri.
In 1998, his name appeared on a ‘fatwa’ — an Islamic legal pronouncement — calling for a ‘full-scale war of jihad’ against Britain and America, though he later said he never authorised his name being included, and condemns its contents.
In video footage from a rally in Trafalgar Square in 1997, Javaid rants about ‘kufr’ — a derogatory term for non-Muslims — berates the West, and calls for the re-establishment of an Islamic state.
This is extremely troubling but this is what islam is doing to Europe as socialists and communists like the Labour party in Britain do everything in their power to allow militant muslims to enter the West in large numbers.
But we are not supposed to say anything bad about “multicultural” London. Breitbart News reports about legendary British entertainer John Cleese:
Monty Python star John Cleese is under fire from the left for daringly, controversially pointing out that multicultural London no longer feels very English.
This tells us more about the hypocrisy and dishonesty of the left than it does about John Cleese — or London.
To say that Londonistan is a foreign city these days is about as contentious as saying that sheep make baaing noises and are a useful source of wool.
And who can forget the bizarrely inappropriate but hugely revealing comment of left-wing journalist George Eaton in the aftermath of the March 2017 terrorist attack on Westminster Bridge?
Four pedestrians had been mown down and killed, a police officer had been stabbed to death, and 49 people had been injured, some crippled for life.
But for woke crusader Eaton — then-deputy editor of the left-wing political journal the New Statesman — the main lesson of all these people being murdered and maimed by an Islamic terrorist was just how wonderful diversity is. Eaton tweeted:
A snapshot of London’s magnificent diversity in those injured: French, Romanian, Korean, German, Polish, Irish, Chinese, US, Italian, Greek.
Yes, the tweet (which he subsequently deleted) was weird and disgusting and grotesque but it was also extremely valuable: it offered all us norms a window into how the liberal-left elite thinks these days.
Diversity, in the liberal-left’s Weltanschauung, is such an unimpeachably desirable thing that you can even feel comfortable bigging it up while the blood from murdered pedestrians is still lying sticky on the pavement.
It’s that “can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs” attitude the modern left has inherited from formative influences like Lenin and Stalin. Never mind the disruption caused by mass immigration to indigenous communities, never mind the stress it puts on schools, hospitals, transport systems, never mind the depressing effect it has on wages: diversity is something to be celebrated at each and every opportunity — yay, even after terrorist attacks!
I personally love it when the left comes up with stuff like this: it’s always good when your enemy reveals himself.
What I really can’t abide, though, are the hypocrisy and double-standards.
Given that it is objectively, observably true that London is like a George Soros fantasy come true of open borders, multiculturalism and white flight — and given that George Eaton and his fellow progressives are forever celebrating this fact, how come it’s not OK when John Cleese points out the obvious?