Clinton Crony Epstein Arrested/ How Trump Will Win in 2020

Fox News reports:

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein has been charged with sex trafficking underage girls in New York and Florida, Fox News has learned.

Epstein, who a decade ago received a lenient plea deal after being accused of paying girls for sexual massages in Florida, is expected to appear in a New York court Monday.

The 66-year-old financier has long been plagued by allegations of sexual abuse against minors.

In 2008, Epstein was sentenced to 13 months in prison, required to settle with his then-teenage victims and register as a sex offender; He could have faced life in prison.

So he got a slap on the wrist from a liberal justice system because he is a huge liberal and Democrat donor.

This is changing under president Trump.

This story gets very interesting. Here is The Washington Times reporting on May 14, 2016 about Epstein’s private Boeing 727 jet, which has been dubbed ‘the Lolita Express’ because he is believed to have used it to transport underage girls for sex:

An investigation into official flight records of financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” are once again dragging former President Bill Clinton into the national spotlight.

Flight logs obtained by Gawker in January 2015 put Mr. Clinton on the billionaire’s infamous jet more than a dozen times — sometimes with a woman whom federal prosecutors suspect of procuring underage sex victims for Mr. Epstein. Fox News reported Friday that records show Mr. Clinton declined Secret Service protection on at least five flights.

The network’s investigation reveals Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727 “Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11 trips.

… Mr. Epstein was arrested in 2005 and signed a plea agreement in 2007 with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, accepting a single charge of soliciting prostitution. He agreed to a 30-month sentence, registered as a “Tier 1” sex offender with the U.S. Virgin Islands and paid dozens of young girls under a federal statute providing for compensation to victims of child sexual abuse.

In case you don’t know it the Trump administration is cracking down hard on sex traffickers, child pornography and child sex exploitation and abuse. There have been hundreds of arrests, perhaps thousands. warned in 2018 that top people were going to fall under president Trump’s justice system to root out the perverts. Does this include Bill Clinton?

Stay tuned. Obama did little about this because virtually all of the perpetrators of such crimes are on the Democrat side. In the MeToo sex abuse scandal, for instance, the top perps were all on the left including Hollywood mogul and Clinton/Democrat donor Harvey Weinstein.

You will see very little in the Fake News media about this Trump crackdown; after all they need to protect their friends.

By the Numbers – How Trump Will Win 2020 is predicting that president Trump is heading for a solid re-election victory in 2020. The numbers are reassuring.

One recent poll said that 71% of Americans believe that the Trump economy is doing good or excellent. That number alone is enough to re-elect the president.

Even anti-Trump USAToday reported recently that Trump has a 49% overall job approval rating, which is enough to win re-election. Obama won re-election in 2012 with lower poll numbers than Trump and a vastly worse economy. also believes that Trump’s approval numbers are going to rise as the election nears and as Americans think seriously about Trump’s strong leadership, particularly on the economy. And whether they really want to shift gears to unknown leaders like Biden, Warren or Sanders.

Trump is saying over and over that electing a Democrat will risk our prosperity. This is very effective and more importantly it is correct. We all should recall that the stock market fell 487 points the day after Obama was elected in 2008. This was a shocking bellwether as the economy then lagged in a depression-like state for 8 years. Which is why Trump was elected.

Other polls like Rasmussen put Trump’s approval at 50% and more. And considering that Trump does not poll well in the first place – many people are afraid to admit that they support him – it certainly looks like he is headed for re-election.

So let us look at the some of the numbers that should re-elect the president. These numbers are generalizations and includes the phrase “one million and possibly many more” votes as a general guide.

These numbers are based on the 2016 popular vote of 62.9 million votes for president Trump, 65.8 million for Hillary Clinton, and Trump winning 57% of the electoral votes and 30 electoral states out of 50:

*First and foremost believes that Trump is going to get all of the voters in 2020 who voted for him in 2016. This is a solid base for his re-election. On top of that:

* believes that Trump is going to get one million and possibly many more conservative votes and the same number of Republican votes that he did not get in 2016 when many in these two groups stayed home.

They did not trust Trump. These voters did not believe that Trump was a conservative or would ever be more than a political ghost who would disappear quickly after losing the election. Many assumed that he was going to lose to Hillary so they didn’t bother voting.

Some of them even voted for Hillary. But they now recognize that president Trump is a strong leader who has done more for the conservative/Republican cause than anyone since president Ronald Reagan.

Already big Republican donors who did not support Trump in 2016 are giving heavily to his 2020 campaign. This is a significant development.

*President Trump is going to play the “sympathy card” big time. He is going to point out during his 2020 campaign that the media have treated him abysmally. He is going to say again and again that the Mueller investigation indeed was a “witch hunt”. This approach will garner him many ‘sympathy’ votes – one million and possibly many more votes – from people who did not vote for him in 2016 or who stayed home.

*The president is going to run hard against the ‘do nothing Democrats’ in Congress who literally are doing nothing to help the country. He knows that one million and possibly many more of those voters will say “yes” to Trump.

* believes that Trump is going to get one million and possibly many more black votes and the same number of hispanic votes that he did not get in 2016. He is going to ask these voters if they are better off under the thriving Trump economy than they were under Obama. The answer will be “yes”.

These votes are going to come directly out of the Democrat total and go into Trump’s column. This is a double whammy for the Democrats.

* believes that there will be one million and possibly many more other Democrats who voted for Hillary in 2016 who will vote for Trump in 2020. After all, many so-called ‘Reagan Democrats’ already voted for Trump in 2016 and that happened even though Trump was largely unknown and was only making promises.

Now that he is delivering solid results believes that many more Democrats will ‘flip’. This is another double-whammy for Democrats.

*One million and possibly many more union members who traditionally have voted Democrat have seen Trump standing up for them in states like Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania where jobs have been disappearing for decades. They see Trump as their ally and will vote for him, not for the Democrats.

* believes that one million and possibly many more college graduates who were unemployed and hopeless under Obama but who didn’t vote in 2016 or who hated Trump and voted for Hillary now have jobs and hope in the thriving Trump economy. Many of them are going to vote Trump in 2020.

All in all, believes that president Trump will easily win the popular vote total in 2020 with up to 9 million and possibly many more votes than he got in 2016, and will surge in the Electoral College vote total.

And just to show how this works, imagine that Trump wins all of the electoral votes that he got in 2016 – 304 votes and 30 states, which easily won the White House. He then could win more states like this:

Trump lost Minnesota by 45,000 votes in 2016. This means that if he ‘flipped’ just half of that – 22,500 votes – from Democrat to Trump he would win the 10 electoral votes in Minnesota. Out of 9 million or more votes nationally, this is entirely possible.

In Nevada, the president lost by 27,000 votes in 2016. Therefore he would have to “flip” 13,500 votes to win the state and its 6 electoral votes. Out of 9 million or more votes nationally, this is entirely possible.

Trump lost New Hampshire in 2016 by a mere 3,000 votes. So if he can “flip” just 1,500 votes he can win New Hampshire’s three electoral votes. Out of 9 million or more votes nationally, this is entirely possible.

In short Trump’s 9 million or possibly many more new and switched votes could “flip” up to seven electoral states to president Trump that he did not win in 2016 like Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Oregon and Virginia. After winning 57% of the electoral votes in 2016 predicts that he could win up to 70% or more in 2020.

Another side effect is that a big Trump win would bring the US House of Representatives back under Republican control; maintain Republican control of the US Senate; and bring up hundreds of state and local Republican office seekers from governors to state legislators to city councilors.

At the same time Democrats increasingly are calling to eliminate the Electoral College. This is happening since they lost two presidential races in recent history (2000 and 2016) after winning the popular vote but losing the Electoral College.

The Electoral College was established by the Founders of America, however, as a block on “direct democracy”, which is direct election of the president by the popular vote.

If there were direct elections then presidential candidates would always campaign in the same places, mostly around cities and on the populated East Coast and in California, and they would ignore much of the rest of the country.

By fluctuating in their political influence under the Electoral College system low-population states like New Hampshire and Iowa can become important and attract the attention of a presidential campaign.

Think of the Electoral College this way: The baseball World Series is seven games maximum. The first team to win four games wins the series. This is the way that the Series always has been played. This is like the Electoral College where the first candidate to get to 270 votes is the winner.

But imagine that all seven games were played and that the team that got the most total runs would be the winner. That would be the equivalent of a direct democracy – add up the runs on both sides and the highest number wins.

Yet there has been no complaint about the World Series or the Stanley Cup hockey playoffs going to the first winner of four games.

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.