Left-Wing Elites Defend, Condone Violent ‘antifa’ Terrorists

The academic elites in America are shockingly out of touch with our nation. Consider a Dartmouth College professor who defends the violent left-wing anti-Trump, anti-police group ‘antifa’. The Washington Post reported in 2017:

Dartmouth College lecturer Mark Bray … is the author of a new book on antifa, the far-left activist movement whose members advocate using any means necessary, including violence, to combat white supremacy. In the span of just a couple of weeks, dozens of national news outlets have turned to him to help explain the movement as debate has raged over how the country should deal with a rising tide of violent racism.

OK, let’s look carefully at this paragraph. First of all, the Washington Post suggests that there is a “rising tide of violent racism” which is allegedly being perpetrated by white supremacists. But in reality the highest rates of violence in America come from three sources, none of which are white. These sources are:

*The most violent Americans by far are blacks while their victims often are white people – by the millions. Blacks also target hispanics, Asians, muslims, etc. The rate of violence by blacks against whites is dozens of times higher than vice versa.

Yet somehow we are supposed to believe that there is a bogeyman of white supremacism out there. This is intended to distract us from reality.

*Another group with a sky-high crime rate is latino illegal immigrants, who often prey on white people or cause the deaths of white people, like in drunk driving crashes or murders. Yet there is virtually no reporting on this by the Fake News media. These media skunks actively seek to cover up this crime wave.

*A third group of violent people are muslims who perpetrate terrorist acts on white Americans and Europeans at astronomically high rates compared to white Americans’ and Europeans’ violence against muslims, which is virtually non-existent.

In short ‘antifa’ is setting up a straw man of white supremacy, which barely even exists. ‘Antifa’, on the other hand, is a violent group that uses its power to silence anyone with whom it disagrees including Trump supporters, conservatives, law-abiding white people who tell the truth about crime, etc. It never targets or exposes violent blacks, illegal immigrants or muslims.

‘Antifa’ also uses a terrorist and neo-nazi tactic of hiding its faces behind black masks. Every state and city should outlaw this practice.

‘Antifa’ is part of a network of anarchist, communist and fascist activists who intimidate, harm and kill people and destroy the property of those with whom they disagree politically, as Republican headquarters offices have been sabotaged in various places and Republican political candidates attacked. Three Trump supporters were even murdered leading up to the 2016 election.

‘Antifa’ is being classified as a domestic terror group. Politico.com reported on September 1, 2017:

Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as “antifa” had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as “domestic terrorist violence,” according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.

… Previously unreported documents disclose that by April 2016, authorities believed that “anarchist extremists” were the primary instigators of violence at public rallies against a range of targets. They were blamed by authorities for attacks on the police, government and political institutions, along with symbols of “the capitalist system,” racism, social injustice and fascism, according to a confidential 2016 joint intelligence assessment by DHS and the FBI.

But this does not stop the leftist elites at places like Dartmouth from defending ‘antifa’. Yet there are no repercussions against these elites. But if a white person says “I am proud to be white and proud of the accomplishments of white people throughout history” that person is singled out and it is called ‘hate speech’ by the same elites. The Washington Post continued:

Many of (Mark) Bray’s colleagues have celebrated his foray into the national spotlight, where his scholarly work in political radicalism has landed him prime-time interviews on NBC and NPR.

But Dartmouth officials are unsettled. Bray has made no secret about his belief that violence is, in some circumstances, justified. In turn, the university has sought to distance itself from him.

Oh, sure, Dartmouth has ‘sought to distance itself from him’. What a joke. If that is true then they should fire him. But they have not done so and never will. Dartmouth loves this guy.

During an appearance on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’, Bray argued that “when pushed, self-defense is a legitimate response to white supremacist and neo-nazi violence.”

This is a total fabrication. ‘Antifa’ is not using “self defense”. It is offensively attacking people with whom it disagrees. ‘Antifa’ regularly goes looking for trouble with their masks and threats and weapons.

The rioters who did widespread damage in Washington, DC during Trump’s inauguration were ‘antifa’ and ‘antifa’-related thugs. This damage was not defensive; it was offensive.

‘Antifa’ is itself a neo-nazi group that uses brazenly neo-nazi tactics. In Germany in the 1930s pro-Hitler mobs attacked people who were opposed to the rise of Hitler’s violent regime.

In America ‘antifa’ physically and rhetorically intimidates and attacks law-abiding people like police, border agents, Trump supporters, conservatives and others who want law and order and who oppose the rise of violent leftists like blacks, illegal immigrants, hispanics, muslims and whites like those in ‘antifa’.

Bray said, “We’ve tried ignoring neo-nazis in the past. We’ve seen how that turned out in the ’20s and ’30s. A lot of people are under attack, and sometimes they need to be able to defend themselves. It’s a privileged position to say you never have to defend yourself from these kinds of monsters.”

So what people are really “under attack”?

Answer: White Americans are. Whites are being relentlessly targeted in crimes and singled out in daily hate-speech attacks from the media and Democrats; this has the effect of inciting physical attacks against whites. Millions of black murders, robberies, assaults, rapes and intimidation of whites have been incited directly by racial hatred.

For instance, a young white boy was thrown off a balcony at a mall in Minnesota by an angry black male. The boy suffered massive injuries in the 4-story fall. You can be sure that this kid was targeted for being white.

That is why so many leftists/communists repeat over and over that white people are “racist” and are ‘white supremacists’. It is done to encourage and excuse black violence against whites.

Dartmouth president Philip J. Hanlon said that Bray was “supporting violent protest.”

“As an institution, we condemn anything but civil discourse in the exchange of ideas. The endorsement of violence in any form is contrary to Dartmouth values.”

OK, so Dartmouth should fire Bray. But there is no indication in July 2019 that that has happened.

America was founded on the principle that political differences should be resolved peacefully. ‘Antifa’ wants to resolve them with violence, like in dictatorships, while the Washington Post tells us about the bogeyman of “white supremacy”.

This is nothing new. Democrat US House speaker Nancy Pelosi said that the ultra-violent and murderous Salvadoran latino immigrant gang MS-13, which has thousands of victims in the US, has “the spark of divinity”.

Imagine if president Trump praised a white mob that killed one single black person. He would be impeached.

In 2011 Pelosi expressed her support of the lawless Occupy Wall Street movement, saying, “I support the message to the establishment, whether it’s Wall Street or the political establishment and the rest, that change has to happen. We cannot continue in a way this is not relevant to their lives.”

The Washington Post continued about Bray:

Now, Bray’s colleagues are coming to his defense. More than 100 faculty members at Dartmouth have signed a letter calling on the president to retract the statement, as the Chronicle of Higher Education reported Monday. They said Dartmouth officials issued the statement without consulting Bray first and allowed his critics in the media to distort his remarks. Bray subsequently received death threats, they said.

“Professor Bray was exposed to violent threats, without so much as a basic effort even to warn him that the College intended to endorse the mischaracterization of his position and the implied attack on his scholarly standing by making clear he had no institutional support,” the letter read.

Well, heck, it is no surprise that Bray received death threats. He is openly supporting a terrorist group that kills people and advocates killing innocent people. The Washington Post reported:

Antifa’s numbers are almost impossible to determine because the movement is decentralized and leaderless, but its activities have surged since President Trump’s inauguration, when activists clad head-to-toe in black destroyed property in Washington and other cities. The general philosophy of the movement is that some right-wing extremists are so dangerous that it is acceptable to use violence to stop them.

So who are these so-called “right wing extremists”? We have been hearing about these groups for decades. Yet they never seem to actually appear except in very isolated incidents. Meanwhile ‘antifa’ has come to dominate the radical city of Portland, Oregon and is protected by city leaders when it attacks innocent people like conservative journalist Andy Ngo.

Meanwhile Breitbart News reported about another hotbed of pro-‘antifa’ activism in… where else?… wealthy, left-wing Silicon Valley. Allum Bokhari writes:

Antifa, the violent far-left mob that brutally assaulted journalist Andy Ngo yesterday, has widespread support amongst the Silicon Valley Masters of the Universe, where employees are allowed to broadcast support for the movement, which also appears to be immune to social media bans on violence, “hate,” and extremism.

Rose City Antifa, the Antifa group that organized yesterday’s protest (in Portland, Oregon), has been posting regularly on Twitter since the attack on Ngo and others, retweeting celebratory tweets about the violence and joking about milkshakes laced with quick-dry cement, which Portland Police say was a projectile weapon used by Antifa during the violence.

According to Twitter’s rules, groups that engage in violent extremism both online and offline will be banned from the platform. Yet Rose City Antifa, along with numerous other Antifa-supporting accounts is given free rein on the site.

One account, according to its owner, belongs to an employee of the company. Twitter user “euprax1a” claims to be an employee at Twitter Seattle, as well as a “neurodivergent queer” and a supporter of Antifa. The account is followed by Twitter Open, an official company account, and was at one point followed by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.

Far Left Watch, a group that monitors left-wing extremism, has also revealed how Twitter ignored its reports of Antifa accounts that were engaged in doxing (revealing hitherto private information) of ICE agents.

Google also has a big Antifa problem. The class-action lawsuit brought by attorney Harmeet Dhillon on behalf of Google employees who allege discrimination on the basis of race, sex, and political viewpoint, has revealed widespread support for Antifa within the search giant.

From Breitbart News’ previous article on the topic:

According to the Damore complaint, “a large number of Googlers have set their corporate profile pictures to Antifa insignias, as seen in the image below.”

The complaint also provides numerous examples of current and former Google employees expressing support for Antifa and for political violence.

In one screenshot of an internal discussion at Google, an employee describes his coworkers as “Nazis,” deserving of violence.

In further screenshots, Googlers continue to endorse political violence against “Nazis,” while also describing Breitbart News and supporters of the “America First” slogan as “Nazis.”

Last year, Breitbart News reached out to Google asking them if they would offer a statement condemning political violence, after obtaining material revealing a series of statements of support for political violence form one of its former employees, Tim Chevalier. At the time, Google offered no response.

Meanwhile The Gateway Pundit reports:

The man killed in Saturday’s (July 13) terror attack on an ICE contract detention facility in Tacoma, Washington (near Seattle) has been identified as Willem Van Spronsen, a man with a record of attacking police during a protest at the facility a year ago. Antifa activists are claiming the attacker as one of their own.

So there you go. This is what Democrats are going to run on in 2020 – open borders and violence against those who protect our borders. And Democrats will lose.

Van Spronsen is the type of person who is leading to the rapid political rise of secure-borders conservatives all over the US and Europe, including president Trump.

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.