Dayton Killer a Democrat Satanist / Democrats Look Weak for 2020 / ‘Climate’ Kooks Out of Control

The Dayton, Ohio mass killer, Connor Betts, now dead, posted pictures of himself on the internet wearing clothes with satanist patches on them.

Thus these murders were obviously the result of a God-less culture that Democrats promote every day, that hates life, defends criminals and illegal aliens and supports abortion.

But Democrats blame it on “the gun” and president Trump and “white supremacism” in order to divert attention from the real cause.

Betts was also a registered Democrat. He hated Trump and loved Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren. He re-tweeted ‘antifa’ accounts. He wrote on Twitter:

I want socialism, an i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding

It gets worse. Multiple news sources are reporting that Betts was suspended in 2012 from high school for compiling a “hit list” of people he wanted to kill and a “rape list” of girls he wanted to sexually assault.

In other words, like many of these mass killers, this guy was known as evil yet nobody did anything about him. This is typical. This is why these killings happen – because our “progressive” and ‘non-judgmental’ culture refuses to single out bad people and act on them.

It gets worse. Fox News then reported:

The discovery of the hit list in early 2012 prompted a police investigation and caused roughly one-third of students to skip school out of fear for their safety, according to the AP report.

Betts had no apparent criminal record as an adult, though if he had been charged as a juvenile those offenses would typically be sealed under state law.

“There’s nothing in this individual’s record that would have precluded him from getting these weapons,” Dayton Police Chief Richard Biehl said Sunday.

OK, so the liberals scream about guns but then this guy was able to buy a gun because of the endless ‘progressive’ laws protecting criminals, including youthful offenders and other obvious crazies.

Meanwhile here is a summary from Breitbart News of some of the guns used in the most popular Hollywood film of the August 3 weekend precisely as the elites in Tinsel Town scream for gun control:

This weekend’s number one box office movie Fast and Furious Presents Hobbs and Shaw features tons of big guns and several shooting senses.

The Universal Pictures spin-off ruled the box office, hauling in a solid $60 million. And the first Fast and Furious spin-off starring Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Jason Statham feature some gruesome shooting scenes and very big guns, debuting on the same weekend that Hollywood stars where seen calling for stricter gun control laws in the wake of two deadly mass shootings across the U.S.

Here’s just some of the guns featured in the latest Fast and Furious film.

The Beretta 92FS with custom grips holstered is used by Madam M (Eiza González).
The film’s villain Brixton (Idris Elba) uses a two-tone Glock 17 to mow down anyway who gets in his way.
At one point in the film, the Glock 26 is used by both Hattie Shaw (Vanessa Kirby) and Elba.
Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham) uses a Heckler & Koch Mark 23.
A SIG-Sauer P226R is used throughout the film by Deckard Shaw.
A nickel Chiappa Rhino 60DS is shot several times by Hobbs.
A Remington 870 shotgun is used by Hattie Shaw (Vanessa Kirby) among other henchmen.
Deckard Shaw is seen using a double-barreled shotgun.
The CZ Scorpion Evo 3 A1 is wielded by Luke Hobbs, Deckard Shaw, and Madam M (Eiza González).
One henchmen is seen with a Heckler & Koch MP5A3.
The HS Produkt VHS-K2 is used by Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham).

The last three are assault weapons – the ones that liberals hate…

Now here is today’s main commentary:

Democrats Look Weak for 2020

Increasingly Democrats and their media cronies are realizing and admitting that president Trump is likely to be re-elected in 2020.

Their worries are justified. Nikitas3.com has predicted many times that Trump will be re-elected, perhaps in a landslide.

This prediction is based largely on the strong economy which generally indicates re-election for a president of either party. But it also refers to Trump’s leadership on border security, trade and foreign policy.

This coincides with the fact that Democrats are moving farther and farther to the hard left politically and are falling out of favor with a clear majority of Americans.

Pollster Frank Luntz, a no-nonsense and keen observer of politics for almost 30 years, said this about the 20+ candidates currently running for the Democrat nomination:

I want to make this clear for the viewers. This is not a fight for the soul of the Democrat Party. That fight is over. And the hostility of these Democratic candidates, most of them, to corporate America, to CEOs, to those who have been successful is significant. The language I’ve heard in the last 48 hours is language I’ve never heard from ANY mainstream Democrat… This is about changing the structure and the economy of the United States. And they’re determined to turn it upside down. And, I gotta tell you, I’ve been following this since 1992, I’ve never heard candidates this extreme. I’ve never heard candidates this hostile to economic freedom and they got the base of the Democratic Party absolutely behind them.

At the same time many Democrats and their hangers-on like filmmaker Michael Moore are becoming so dispirited with these militant and uninspiring candidates that they are pleading with Michelle Obama to run.

This is very telling; they are turning in desperation to someone with zero experience making executive decisions running anything – from a city to a state to a business – to be our next president. This is alarming.

Meanwhile labor union members who have generally been consistent Democrat voters are slipping away to Trump. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said to Democrats, “It’s time to do better. I believe you can. I believe you will. And working people are hungry for it. But you can’t offer campaign rhetoric or count on workers’ votes simply because you have a ‘D’ next to your name.”

At the same time public interest in this endless Democrat campaign is fading which is more bad news for the liberals. Democrats are “peaking” too early and losing their audience. The Hollywood Reporter said about the late-July debates:

(CNN’s) coverage of the 10 candidates slides by more than 40 percent over the first debate of the primary cycle in late June.

The second Democratic presidential primary debate didn’t draw nearly as big an audience as the first.

CNN’s coverage of Tuesday’s debate — the first of two, featuring 10 candidates each night — drew 8.69 million viewers (including CNN en Español). That’s down a sizable 43 percent from the opening debate on June 26…

How about this for bad news. The Gateway Pundit reported:

MSNBC asked voters on Tuesday after the first CNN Democratic Presidential Debate what they thought about the Democrat platform for 2020.

What they found was that a VAST MAJORITY of Americans reject their insanity.

Only around 27% of Americans agree with Democrats on:

** Medicare for all (41%)
** Decriminalizing border crossings — Open Borders (27%)
** Free healthcare for illegals (33%)
** Reparations (27%)

In short, more bad news for Democrats. When all 10 Democrat debaters raised their hands to support free health care for illegal immigrants it was a tremendously damaging image that is going to be turned into a Republican campaign ad, guaranteed.

The big story in recent weeks is the falling popularity of presumptive 2020 front runner Joe Biden whom Nikitas3.com warned from the start is a weak candidate. Here is an excerpt from a commentary by media analyst Howard Kurtz warning Democrats who are attacking Biden over his role in the Obama administration:

There was a moment in the presidential debate when Joe Biden said something that somehow sounded absurdly out of step to the free-swinging progressives on the stage.

“If you cross the border illegally, you should be able to be sent back. It’s a crime,” Biden said.

Think about that. The former vice president of the United States says we should enforce our immigration laws, and that brands him as a man of the past.

It was one of many ways that those running for the 2020 nomination are increasingly turning on the record of Barack Obama, who left office just 2-1/2 years ago. How that helps them beat Donald Trump is a mystery to me.

The context was the Obama administration’s deportation of nearly 800,000 illegal immigrants. When Biden wouldn’t repudiate that, Julian Castro said, “it looks like one of us has learned the lessons of the past and one of us hasn’t.” And Cory Booker chided Biden for not being willing to say whether he had dissented from the Obama approach.

Suddenly, the 44th president’s record is being openly dissed by the new, more (aware) generation of those who covet the office he once held.

This will be another point of attack for president Trump who will say, “The Democrats are so radical that they are even turning on the extremist Obama…”

Trump will be deploying another significant campaign taunt, that the Democrats in the House of Representatives in Washington are doing nothing for the country except screaming about impeaching the president. This will help Republicans to win back the House in 2020, Nikitas3.com believes. Kurtz continued:

The mainstream media have never liked the Biden candidacy. Most journalists and commentators find him too old, too uninspiring and insufficiently liberal. They predicted doom before he got in the race, wrote his obituary after the MSNBC debate, and are decidedly lukewarm in the wake of the Detroit debate.

Indeed. The ‘mainstream media’, which have lost all credibility among conservatives and among tens of millions of other Americans, are driving the race and pushing the Democrats further and further to the unelectable left. This is good news for conservatives.

A strong 2020 win for Trump also will bring along hundreds of other Republican/conservative candidates like US senators and congresspeople, governors, state representatives and even mayors and city councilors.

Meanwhile Rush Limbaugh said:

“People need to understand how the Democrats see America. This is the thing that just boggles my mind. They look out over this landscape. They see nothing but suffering. They don’t see anybody other than in pain, victims of this, victims of that. Then they position themselves as the people who are going to fix it and get even with the other people — us — who have caused all of this misery. And there isn’t anything they talk about that involves improving life. They talk about jobs, not careers. They do not offer anybody anything uplifting, and they haven’t created a group of voters that even thinks uplifting. Their voter group is mired in all kinds of misery, injustice to the point they’re covering up George Washington in murals in San Francisco, rather than cleaning the human feces off the streets out there.”

“It’s an amazing thing to see how this is all — your guests just before me on this show — stop and think of it — three years ago, about that, nobody thought that Donald Trump could win. I’m talking about in the mainstream, the media, the Washington establishment. Nobody thought he could win. Tonight, nobody thinks anybody on that Democrat debate stage can win. In just three years we have gone from a candidate that everybody was laughing at and thinking had no prayer and wasn’t even serious about winning to now nobody on the Democrat side is — they’re asking Michelle Obama to get in and save them. If they’re doing that, that’s a tantamount admission that nobody they’re running now has a slight chance or even a prayer.”

‘Climate’ Kooks are Totally Out of Control

The ‘climate change’ alarmists are like a mob of frenzied loonies who are constantly trying to outdo each other with their dire assessment of the future. If Kook A claims that ‘global warming’ is going kill 10 million people then Kook B simply claims that it will kill 50 million.

It started decades ago with outrageous claims by top ‘greenie’ alarmists on the first “earth day” in 1970. Some of their absurd predictions are listed further down in this commentary.

Today we have gone from claims that we have only 12 years to solve ‘climate change’ under Ocasio-Cortez to the point where it is allegedly too late. Democrat presidential candidate Andrew Yang said recently:

“This is going to be a tough truth but we are too late. We are 10 years too late. We need to do everything we can to start moving the climate in the right direction but also need to start moving our people to higher ground and the best way to do that is to put economic resources in your hands so you can protect yourself and your families.”

This is comical. There is no evidence anywhere that sea levels are rising as Yang implies when he says that people must move “to higher ground”.

Al Gore even claimed in 2007 that sea levels were going to rise 17 feet yet in 2010 he bought a $9 million home right on the beach in California.

So much for “rising seas”… even the ‘green’ fanatics don’t believe their own press. Meanwhile it gets worse every day. The Huffington Post reported:

Democratic presidential candidate Jay Inslee hinted Wednesday that he is open to prosecuting fossil fuel executives, a topic that came up in Tuesday’s CNN debate and is likely to again enter the debate’s second installment.

Standing in a community center just across the street from Michigan’s only oil refinery, the Washington governor said the Department of Justice should ultimately decide whether to charge executives from any industry with committing a crime.

“But I do know the decisions being made are killing people in the United States,” Inslee said of the oil, gas and coal industry. “That’s something that should be taken seriously.”

This is pure demagoguery and insanity yet this stuff is taken seriously by a lot of these extremists. And it is very dangerous. It seeks to criminalize the everyday energy sources that have contributed crucially for hundreds of years to our survival, advancement and prosperity.

Perhaps we should prosecute former mayors of Baltimore for allowing hundreds of thousands of the city’s residents to slide into oblivion under their policies. But you will never see the Democrats talk about anything like that.

Here is more from The Daily Signal on March 10, 2016:

In news that should shock and anger Americans, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that not only has she discussed internally the possibility of pursuing civil actions against so-called “climate change deniers,” but she has “referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action.”

Lynch was responding to a question from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who urged Lynch to prosecute those who “pretend that the science of carbon emissions’ dangers is unsettled,” particularly those in the “fossil fuel industry” who supposedly have constructed a “climate denial apparatus.”

Lynch is apparently following in the footsteps of California Attorney General Kamala Harris and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, both of whom have opened up investigations of ExxonMobil for allegedly lying to the public and their shareholders about climate change.

Fortunately Lynch, Harris and Schneiderman are all gone. And just to remind you about the fraud from the enviro movement at the highest levels here is a doomsday list from top eco-leaders. Every one of these predictions made on the first so-called “earth day” in 1970 has been proven spectacularly and laughably wrong (thanks to Reason.com for this list):

1. “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” — Harvard biologist George Wald
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner
3. “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.” — New York Times editorial
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich
5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.” — Paul Ehrlich
6. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day
7. “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.” — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter
8. “In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.” — Life magazine
9. “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
10. “Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” — Paul Ehrlich
11. “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
12. “[One] theory assumes that the earth’s cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun’s heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine
13. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” — Kenneth Watt

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.