The mantra of the Democrat left and the enviro left for decades has been that we must live naturally, that we must not upset nature, that we must pursue good health, that we must not ingest anything artificial that might harm us, that we must not do anything that will imbalance our bodies.
Yet since the 1960s we have seen these pale-faced human skeletons walking out of ‘health-food stores’ looking as if they are about keel over after they have subsisted on only “natural” or “organic” foods.
Meanwhile women have been told by the feminist left that they should take birth control pills so that they can have unlimited sex without consequence. And that if they get pregnant that they should abort the child.
Yet birth-control pills intentionally upset the natural rhythm of the female body and sometimes even lead to dangerous blood clots.
That is not very “natural”, is it?
And we all know that abortion is a brutal practice and an abrupt mechanical disruption of a natural life cycle that is going to harm a woman in many ways from psychologically to physically.
For instance breast cancer has been linked to abortion, yet all the breast cancer activists ignore this connection because it contravenes the concept of leftist “entitlements” – the right to unlimited sexual pleasure along with unfettered access to abortion.
Indeed one of the last things that feminists tell a woman to do is to get married, stay with her husband, bear her children and love her family. They claim that children are a burden to the “modern woman” and her aggressive lifestyle.
Nonsense. Children are a gift from God, a blessing and a joy, and obviously essential to the propagation of the species. But not to the liberal left. To these people, children are like statistics. Which is why liberals are often such cold and clinical people. Because they cannot even relate to the wonders and delights of kids.
And let’s start holding to account these tens of millions of promiscuous males for the horrible state of affairs these days. These guys have been simply and gladly taking advantage of a sexual culture fomented by the left since the 1960s, a culture that we conservatives have been warning about. And now millions of females too have turned into rabid sexual animals.
Our entire society must retreat to a restrained, well-behaved Christian culture for the benefit of all.
But no, says the left, the solution is in unlimited sex, birth control and abortion…
Now this abortion/birth control debate is breaking out into the open. The reason is that Obama needs to shift the focus off of the terrible economy and get the female vote behind his campaign once again.
In other words the Democrats are saying that “women” should forget about having a job or about gasoline prices. They are saying that the important thing is for women to be able to abort their child or to never get pregnant in the first place by using artificial birth control.
Recall this statement from Obama himself, which really exposes the hard-left view in a nutshell. While addressing a campaign rally in 2008, Obama said:
"When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include — which should include abstinence education and teaching the children — teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include — it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.”
“Punished with a baby”? Those four words indeed speak volumes. This is literally how the left thinks under the anti-life reign of feminism. And this is why many feminists are so unhappy. Because many have intentionally rejected the very thing that historically has made men and women happy in a way that nothing else does – their children.
Meanwhile pro-abortion activist, Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius, told a House panel, according to CNSNews.com that:
… ‘a reduction in the number of human beings born in the United States will compensate employers and insurers for the cost of complying with the new HHS mandate that will require all health-care plans to cover sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives, including those that cause abortions. “The reduction in the number of pregnancies compensates for the cost of contraception,”.’
In plain English this is the abortion lobby and the feminists telling us that children are nothing but economic statistics that are in essence a net minus for society.
Can you believe this stuff? It is shocking coming from a top government official.
Now look at this from telegraph.co.uk in an article called ‘Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say’:
‘Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.
The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.
The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article.
Then he said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.’
Wow. So a “liberal society”, led intellectually by the academic left at Oxford, is one in which children can be killed by choice?
‘The article entitled “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?” was written by two of Prof Savulescu’s former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
They argued: “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”
Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.’
OK, so there you go. This is literally a “war” by the political left on the most defenseless among us – fetuses, newborns and children. It is the most shocking thing imaginable. And don’t think that this stops with newborns or babies. Soon they will be saying that a mother can kill her teenaged son who annoys her. And then she can kill her grown son. And on and on… It is literally laying the intellectual foundation for genocidal insanity.
Now consider this from Amanda Carpenter writing on townhall.com on October 14, 2008 (italics added for emphasis):
‘Newly discovered documents from the Illinois state archives prove Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has lied about his opposition as an Illinois state senator to legislation requiring health officials to provide care to babies who survived abortion.
Obama has repeatedly claimed he would have voted for Illinois’ version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA) had it included language to protect abortion rights guaranteed by Roe v. Wade, as the federal version of the bill did, which sailed through the U.S. Senate 98-0. Contrary to what Obama has said, forgotten records from the Illinois Senate archives show Obama did vote against a BAIPA bill that included such a neutrality clause virtually identical to the federal bill.’
Thus in so many significant ways Democrats are pro-abortion, anti-child and anti-family. Except for themselves of course. Sebelius has two sons and Obama has two daughters. And Obama routinely shows off his happy girls and talks about the joys of family.
This ‘war on children’ is simply abhorrent.
Yet the outrage only is coming from us pro-life conservatives and is being ignored by the media and the Democrats who are advocating these heinous attitudes.
It is shameful… Where is the rest of America?