Gen. Flynn Exonerated/ Virus Concerns Falling/ Ann Coulter is a Fake Conservative

Fox News reported:

The Justice Department on Thursday moved to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, in a stunning development that comes after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI.

The announcement came in a court filing, with the department saying it is dropping the case “after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information.” The DOJ said it had concluded that Flynn’s interview by the FBI was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn” and that the interview was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”

This is great news that discussed in more detail in this commentary. This exoneration comes after the case against general Flynn was proven to be fraudulent when internal FBI documents were found with handwritten comments that FBI had set out to entrap Flynn into lying.

This is another step in the unmasking of the Russia collusion hoax. And more is coming. The Durham DOJ probe is said to be exposing the widespread government fraud against president Trump and his administration. And this time, people associated with Obama like Comey, Clapper, McCabe, Strzok and Page may finally go to jail. will cover the story as it unfolds.

Virus Concerns Falling

Breitbart News reported:

Concerns surrounding the novel coronavirus are dropping among voters in battleground states, a CNBC/Change Research survey released Wednesday revealed.

The survey, taken among 3,544 likely voters in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin between May 1 and May 3, found that 68 percent remain seriously concerned about the coronavirus. While that remains a majority, it signals concerns are gradually lessening, falling from 76 percent April 18 and the high of 87 percent April 3.

The change appears to reflect a partisan shift, as 39 percent of Republicans indicated that they are “seriously” concerned now, “down from 55% two weeks ago,” according to Change Research. Meanwhile, 97 percent of Democrats remained seriously concerned, and 66 percent of independents indicated the same:

This is good news as the intensity of the virus decreases. Thus by the time that election day rolls around in November, the main part of the virus crisis should be past and the economic recovery will likely be underway. This all redounds to the benefit of president Trump, who had a 49% approval rating in a recent Gallup poll. 49% is very high for any president and particularly for Trump who is under relentless media attack, particularly in this very unusual time.

And you can be certain that if there are any virus worries still around on election day, November 3, that cowardly liberals are much more likely than Republicans, conservatives and energized Trump supporters to stay home from voting. And that Democrat urban voters will be much more likely to stay home – since the virus has concentrated in cities – than voters in rural, small-town or suburban ares where Trump is much more popular. These factors will help president Trump to get re-elected.

Fake “Conservative” Ann Coulter Exposed Again

In case you don’t know, “conservative” writer Ann Coulter is just another fake conservative.

She became a “conservative” decades ago when she understood that she could make millions by being a famous conservative just as George Will did. They knew that the liberal side was chock full of commentators so they went to the conservative side to stand out and make money. But unfortunately both Coulter and Will have become anti-Trumpers because they were not real conservatives to begin with. She has repeatedly criticized the president and conservatives.

Like a fickle female, Coulter first abandoned the president when he did not get the Mexican border wall built after two years in office. Yet by the end of 2020, we are expected to have 550 miles of wall, most of it in areas of heavy crossing. So the wall already is being very effective. And the only reason that it is being built is because president Trump persisted and used special means to get the money that Congress would not give him.

But like a moody little schoolgirl, Coulter ran away from Trump as soon as she didn’t get the wall that she claimed that she wanted as fast as she wanted. This is typical of the unhinged female persona – instant gratification or nothing. A real conservative woman would have stuck by the president, as has. believes that there is more to this story than Coulter’s moods. believes that Coulter is being paid off to turn on Trump, perhaps millions of dollars, maybe tens of millions. believes that many of these alleged ‘conservatives’ like Bill Kristol and Jonah Goldberg who have turned on the president are being paid off by wealthy people on the left like George Soros, Silicon Valley billionaires and even the government of China.

Recently Coulter showed her true stripes by writing a column claiming that the coronavirus could not have come from the communist government’s virology laboratory in Wuhan, China, which we conservatives suspect. The column was called Lab Theory of Wuhan Virus Cooked up in Neocon Lab

Thus she not only is claiming that the lab theory is false but is sneering at those of us who suspect that this is the case. She is using ‘Neocon’ (neoconservative) as a term of disparagement, while the term ‘cooked up’ is also a term of casual derision.

But Coulter is not a virus expert. She is just repeating what she reads on the internet and she simply lists six talking points about how the virus could not have been created in a lab. These are pro-China talking points that you can find anywhere on the web and that say that the virus is simply a natural phenomenon that got out of control.

Yet since this crisis only started in January, Coulter has no evidence whatsoever to say that, except by parroting what she reads on the web. It is shocking for her to use her media influence to divert us from possible explanations for the virus. In any criminal investigation, all possiblities must be pursued.

And using simple common sense believes that we must absolutely consider that the virus came from a laboratory since the city of Wuhan has a government virus laboratory that deals in the same kind of virus as that which has stricken the world. believes that the virus came from the lab. And since we know from history that communists are evil and selfish, it certainly looks like China launched the virus intentionally on the world.

If you want to see another similar media fraud, look at the coverage of the April 15, 2019 fire that burned the roof of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris as reconstruction work on the roof was beginning.

Just 12 hours after the fire, Newsweek screamed in an all-caps headline:


First, there was no inquiry in the first 12 hours; this is a total lie. Even today in May 2020, there is no official report on the fire. And wonders why not. A whole year is certainly enough time to come to a conclusion.

Second, Newsweek said without one single shred of evidence and before the embers had even cooled that the fire was an accident. Yet there is no possible way that they could say this so shortly after the fire. Nobody had any idea what caused the fire back then and even today we do not know.

Far-left Newsweek said this to shift the spotlight from the suspicion that the fire was a terrorist act committed by muslims against the center of Christianity in Europe. It is no coincidence that the fire occurred during Easter Holy Week. believes that left-wing, atheist and pro-muslim forces within the French government and media are doing everything possible to stall the probe and/or divert us from the idea that it was a terrorist act. fully expects a cover-up of the real cause of the fire, which I believe was a terrorist act.

Since the fire started after workers had left the site for the day, believes that it was started by a terrorist incendiary (fire-starting) device that was planted by an anti-Christian or muslim worker at the site during work hours and ignited by a cell phone after the site was vacated, to make it look like an accident.

The Sydney Morning Herald in Australia reported just four days after the fire:

Investigators suspect an electrical short-circuit was the most likely cause of the Notre-Dame Cathedral fire, according to a French judicial police official.

The official, who did not wish to be named, says investigators still do not have the green light to work in the cathedral or search in the rubble, for safety reasons.

This is certainly false and is more Fake News. Notice that the “French judicial police official” is not identified. These media skunks use anonymous sources over and over to create any kind of Fake News that they want.

When Europeans work on the highly flammable roof of a national historic landmark like Notre Dame, which is made of wood that is 850 years old and bone dry, the work is very closely scrutinized and regulated by separate layers of government, safety, historical and architectural groups. Cigarettes, heat sources and electrical cables are not allowed. A short-circuit would therefore be impossible. Meanwhile, The Geller Report, which tracks terrorism in the West, stated:

Here is the latest update from Maxime Lépante, our French correspondent in France…

This is an update about what we know today about the fire that destroyed the roof and parts of the vaults of Notre-Dame:

1) Restoration work hadn’t started on the roof. The scaffolding were still being put in place. The architect in chief of the “Monuments Historiques” (“Historical Monuments”, the administration that maintains and repairs monuments in France), Philippe Villeneuve, who was responsible for the refurbishing of the spire of Notre-Dame, has stated that : “Work had not started yet, scaffoldings were still being built”.

2) Everything was done to avoid any source of heat near the wood of the roof. No electrical plug, no welding were allowed. So, Philippe Villeneuve says : “The hot spot hypothesis is therefore not the right one”.

3) The head of the company that was building the scaffoldings (Europe Echafaudage) (Europe Scaffolding), Julien Le Bras, was interviewed by a French TV (BFM) : “All I can say for the time being is that at the moment of the fire, absolutely none of the employees of my company was present on site”.

4) He added : “All safety procedures on the Notre-Dame de Paris site have been respected”.

5) One of my friend sent me an email concerning the security on the roof of Notre-Dame. She has a diploma in Art history and studied in the “Ecole du Louvre” (“Louvre School”, were students learn art history and restoration processes) : “I visited the framing of Notre Dame with architects of the “Bâtiments de France” (“Buildings of France”, the highest rank for an architect in France), some years ago. This 13th century timber frame was extremely protected. Each intervention is always accompanied by historians, architects, experts; no work is envisaged without extreme caution; no source of heat, no torch, no electrical apparatus is allowed; a high-performance alarm system is in place; and very strict supervision of all people allowed there. I think we will eventually learn that this was arson.”

6) So, as I said yesterday, with all these security measures, to have a fire on the roof of Notre-Dame, someone had to bring something there, and lit it up.

This sounds a thousand times more reasonable than the conclusions of Newsweek. or of the Sydney Morning Herald or the rest of the Fake News media who all reported the accident theory. Meanwhile look at this nonsense which came as the second entry on the very first page of the Google search about the fire from a website called

Notre Dame is still in bad shape after a fire tore through the historic structure in April 2019. While the people of Paris lament that the famed cathedral may be closed for up to a decade, scientific experts are making the best of this bad situation, as parts of the building that would never have been accessible before the fire have been revealed for study.

One such area of study is in the now-gutted attic, which was known as Notre Dame’s “Forest,” an affectionate name that describes the numerous massive wooden beams that make up the frame of the roof. The wood here, which has now been marred by fire, dates back to the original construction of Notre Dame, with some of the wood dating as far back as the 11th century.

Alexa Dufraisse, a dendroanthropologist, suggested that studying this nearly 1,000-year-old wood could give us insight into historical weather patterns, which could in turn teach us about modern climate change. She told Science News that this study could not have been undertaken had the fire not occurred.

In other words, Google is directing us to a ‘greenie’ angle on this historic tragedy and turning it into an investigation into ‘climate change’. These “greenie” and media hoaxsters never stop with their crusade. They are sick people.

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.