Fake Polls Get Faker/ No Hysteria over Ginsburg/ Mail-in Vote Fraud Explodes

First, here is a word about mail-in ballots:

Democrats have been pushing for mail-in ballots and Republicans have opposed it. But there is great news about mail-in voting for Republicans. There are four major drawbacks to mail-in ballots that are going to hurt Democrat candidates. This will happen because Democrat voters are going to cast their ballots by mail at vastly higher rates than Republicans because of the China virus. Meanwhile Republicans are vowing to vote overwhelmingly in person to make sure that their vote is counted.

Here are the four reasons that mail-in ballots will backfire on Democrats:

*Mail-in ballots have a high rate of rejection for being filled out improperly, reportedly up to 20% and more. This is a very significant rate of rejection.

*Mail-in ballots of black voters, who vote overwhelmingly Democrat, are reported to have twice the rejection rate of whites for being improperly filled out.

*In most states, voters must specifically apply for their mail-in ballot. Nikitas3.com estimates that millions of voters may neglect to apply, will not apply in time, or will not apply properly (136.67 million Americans voted in the 2016 presidential election).

*Most of the ‘harvested’ ballots (collected by a third party instead of mailed back to the voter registrar) are going to be from Democrat voters, and so irregularities (ballots trashed, stolen, lost, etc.) are going to hurt Democrats.

See the story further down for more on mail-in ballot fraud.

Look at these Fake ABC News Polls

The Washington Post reported on September 10, 2016:

Hillary Clinton maintains a lead over Donald Trump, but lagging interest among some of her supporters poses a potential turnout challenge for Democrats with less than nine weeks before Election Day, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Clinton holds a 46 percent to 41 percent edge over Trump among likely voters, followed by Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson at 9 percent and the Green Party’s Jill Stein at 2 percent. Clinton’s lead swells to 10 percentage points among the wider swath of registered voters, 45 percent to 35 percent, similar to her 45 percent to 37 percent edge last month.

Yessiree, a 5 point to 10 point lead for Hillary. Yet Trump won 57% of the electoral votes – 304 votes for Trump and 224 for Hillary – because these national polls are irrelevant, particularly when they are conducted by anti-Trump media outfits like ABC. The only important polls are individual state polls but even those are generally inaccurate.

In fact Hillary did win the national popular vote, but only by 48 to 46, or a 2 point gap. So where was the big 5-point to 10-point lead? Good question.

Meanwhile Gary Johnson got just 3.25%, not 9%, of the vote in 2016, and Jill Stein got 1%, not 2%. So this ABC poll was way off, as usual.

The Washington Post continued:

The poll finds no clear advantage for Trump across a range of issues and personal attributes. Clinton holds a nine-point advantage among registered voters on being closer to them on the issues, a 12-point advantage on “understanding the problems of people like you” and a 26-point edge on having the better personality and temperament to be president.

But Trump won the White House. So obviously this poll was a joke like most of these polls are. Then look at this about the poll:

The Post-ABC poll was conducted Sept. 5-8 among a random national sample of 1,002 adults reached by cellular and landline phones. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points; the error margin is four points among the sample of 842 registered voters, and 4.5 points among the sample of 642 likely voters.

OK, a “random national sample” is a very poor way to conduct a poll. Any pollster will tell you this. You could be polling people who pay zero attention to politics, or know nothing about the candidates. That is why a poll of ‘likely voters’ is the most accurate.

Meanwhile the Rasmussen Reports poll, which was the most accurate poll of 2016, put president Trump’s approval rating at 53% recently in 2020. Yet Obama was re-elected easily in 2012 with 46% from Rasmussen.

Don’t be fooled by these fake polls. They are going to be rigged even more this year than in 2016 because Democrats are totally desperate to get rid of president Trump.

The Daily Caller reports on September 29, 2020:

Former Vice President Joe Biden holds a 10-point lead over President Donald Trump nationally and a 9-point lead in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania, according to a poll published Tuesday by ABC and The Washington Post.

The ABC poll released Monday (September 28) surveyed 702 registered Pennsylvania voters — 567 of whom said they were “likely voters” — by telephone between September 21-26, and the data has a 4.5 percent margin of error. The break down of political parties showed 38 percent of participants were Democrats, 32 percent were Republicans and 23 percent were Independents.

Notice that the they polled 38% Democrats and 32% Republicans. This is how they skew the polls to Biden, sometime much more than 38-32. They also polled 567 “likely voters”, which is a small sample. Polling requires more than 1,000 people to be accurate and even then the results can be skewed in many ways.

To make things worse, there is a big 4.5% margin of error. All in all, this poll is as fake as they come. Don’t be fooled by these Fake News polls. Look at Rasmussen if you want to see the truth.

Trump Enthusiasm in… Massachusetts?!

Nikitas3.com participates in regular Trump ‘stand outs’, where we hold Trump banners and American flags at a busy intersection in one of the most liberal parts of Massachusetts. And you would not believe how much support we get… waves, honks, thumbs-up, shouts of support.

And this is in a state where Trump got just 32% of the vote in 2016. So there is great news out there. Nikitas3.com predicts that Trump will get 35% to 40% of the Massachusetts vote on November 3.

No Hysteria Among Conservatives when Ginsburg was Confirmed

On August 3, 1993 justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed by the US Senate to serve on the Supreme Court. She was and remains to this day the most extreme far-left justice ever. Yet there was zero hysteria about her nomination among Republicans and conservatives as there is about conservative Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination. Ginburg was confirmed by a vote of 96 to 3 even though there were 43 Republicans in the Senate at the time.

Yet we are expecting zero Democrats to vote to confirm judge Barrett. The vote will probably be 51 Republicans to confirm Barrett, or maybe 52 or 53. So there is an obvious double-standard among Democrats when it comes to the Supreme Court.

When Obama was elected and throughout his tenure, there was not even a miniscule fraction of the hysteria and anger among conservatives that we are seeing from Democrats and progressives aimed at president Trump and everyone associated with him.

Millions of families have been disrupted simply because one or several family members support Trump. Yet during Obama, zero family disruption was caused because we conservatives don’t go nuts every day about politics.

But that is the difference between the two sides – people on the left act out of emotion, and conservatives act out of reason.

Here are some of the lunatic rants from Hollywood about judge Barrett:

Actor John Cusack wrote:

“Every republican is trading mass death for a stacked court that’s goal is, among other horrible things – Taking away healthcare in a pandemic Overturning roe V wade Participating in trumps lawless coup to steal election Taking away the right to vote by mail in a pandemic.”

Notice that he makes no mention of the 40 million “mass deaths” from abortion since 1973.

Screwball so-called ‘comedian’ Alec Baldwin wrote:

“I wonder if Coney, the arch Catholic, realizes that her nomination is only another card that the Psycho turns over to destroy the Constitution”

Nobody called Ginsburg a ‘psycho’. Nobody. Actor George Takei stated:

“An impeached criminal grifter (president Trump) shouldn’t be permitted to appoint a lifetime justice to the Supreme Court. Period.”

Comedian Ike Barinholtz:

“I just read a bunch of Amy Coney Barrett’s opinions and marone is this woman a psychopath,”

Actor Jon Cryer said about Republicans who blocked Obama from filling a Supreme Court seat in 2016 due to it being an election year:

“Dear Republican voters Remember 2016, when the Senators you elected refused to even consider an Obama nominee while screaming ‘Let the American people decide!’?” he tweeted. “Now that they’ve proven to be lying, racist hypocrites, does that make you less likely to vote for them again? Or more?”

So there you go. Thus it is no surprise that American voters are moving away from the crazed Democrats, starting with the election of president Trump in 2016.

Mail-in Vote Fraud Explodes

The fraud connected with mail-in voting is beginning to be exposed. Here are a few recent examples, and you can be sure that there are hundreds of such stories out there that have not been reported or caught. The Gateway Pundit reports:

The New York City Board of Elections is blaming a vendor for an egregious error on absentee ballots mailed to voters in Brooklyn that could cause their votes to be thrown out–even if they follow the rules to the letter. The reason is that the absentee ballots were sent out with return envelopes that were mismatched and bear the names and addresses of other voters so that if the person signs the envelope with their own name it won’t be counted as the signature would not match the name on the mistakenly sent return envelope.

The Blaze reported:

Voters in New York City are sounding the alarm after several have reported receiving absentee ballots containing either the wrong name and address, or another person’s ballot altogether — and officials estimate as many as 140,000 mismatched absentee mailings were sent out.

140,000 ballots… This is a huge number. Interestingly most of these ballots will be for Biden and other Democrats in liberal Brooklyn, and thus any confusion or disqualification is hurting Democrat candidates.

The New York Post reported:

Voters in New York City have received mail-in ballots for the 2020 presidential election marked for military use despite never having served in the armed forces — causing confusion and concerns over whether the ballots can or should be used.

The misprint makes it appear that the voters received a “Official Military Absentee Ballot” instead of a “Military/Absentee Ballot,” leaving several borough residents who received the documents — including two Post journalists — worried that their votes might not be properly tallied.

“I believe that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” said City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer, referring to the constituents in his Sunnyside district who have reached out to him about receiving the ballots. “It appears that everyone has gotten this particular ballot.”

The Gateway Pundit reported:

James O’Keefe III and Project Veritas tonight released video of ballot harvester exchanging $200 for a general election ballot. The harvester is connected to the congressional campaign of Democrat muslim Ilhan Omar.

The Daily Mail reported:

Minneapolis police opens investigation into reports that Ilhan Omar’s supporters illegally harvested (hundreds of) Democrat ballots in Minnesota
Minneapolis police on Monday evening confirmed they were investigating
The police are looking in to claims of voter fraud made by Project Veritas
The media group allege that Ilhan Omar’s supporters were ‘ballot harvesting’
Omar Jamal, a Somali political operative, claimed those in the video back Omar
‘Ballot harvesting,’ or ‘ballot collection,’ is legal in more than half of US states
It allows third parties to collect ballots on behalf of physically-impaired voters
But Republicans have claimed that the practice is vulnerable to voter fraud
In Minnesota a third party can return only three ballot papers
Trump hopes to win key swing state of Minnesota in upcoming election

The Gateway Pundit reported:

Joe Biden’ Texas political director was formally accused of helping run an illegal ballot harvesting operation.

According to the National File two investigators, including a former FBI agent and former police officer, testified under oath they have VIDEO EVIDENCE, documentation and witnesses for their investigation.

Imagine that – the director of the Biden campaign in Texas… This is precisely why president Trump has been talking about mail-in voting as ripe for fraud. Even the top people are doing it.

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,500 previous editorials!) and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.