If you would like to see a fantastic 6-minute video from conservative Michelle Malkin about the corruption involving these Dominion voting machines, go here. The video shows that this corruption has even been traced to the Philippines where similar Dominion machines were suspected of shifting a national election. It includes an interview with a Filipino lawyer.
Nikitas3.com suspects that the same Dominion software was used used in the 2018 US Senate election in Arizona when Republican Martha McSally lost. Her loss followed a similar pattern to many races this year, and in the Philippines – McSally was way ahead on election night only to see her lead disappear.
One computer expert said in a video interview that he could plug into the voting machines in less than one minute and change the totals.
There’s more coming on this scandal as president Trump fights the corrupt Deep State. Trump said on Sunday morning:
“(I got) 74 million votes. (Biden) did not get anywhere near 80 (million votes, as claimed). And that’s 74 before they threw away. You know they threw away ballots. They threw away many Trump ballots. That’s the easiest way they could cheat. We got 74 million votes. He didn’t get anywhere near 80 million votes.
Well, I’m going to use 125% of my energy to (prove this). You need a judge that is willing to hear a case. You need a Supreme Court that is willing to make a really big decision.”
“You would think if you’re in the FBI or Department of Justice, this is the biggest thing you could be looking at. “Where are they? I’ve not seen anything. They just keep moving along and they go on to the next president.”
Amazing. We also know that mail-in ballots have played a huge role in the corruption. And lo and behold, here is Obama talking about mail-in ballots in 2008:
Well, I think we have to figure out whether (mail-in ballots are) fraud proof. I mean, Oregon has a terrific mail-in system but they’ve already scanned everyone’ signature whose registered to vote so that they can check to make sure that in fact the right people are voting.
Gee, no kidding… And many states completely ignored the signature matching requirement this year, which is a perfect way to allow fraudulent ballots to be counted.
Meanwhile The Gateway Pundit reported:
Pennsylvania Judge Patricia A. McCullough filed a Memorandum of Opinion on Friday stating the Pennsylvania preliminary ELECTION CERTIFICATION injunction was PROPERLY ISSUED and should be upheld.
McCullough added this, “Additionally, petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed.”
Naturally the Trump-hating Pennsylvania supreme court overturned this. But this is going to potentially go to the US Supreme Court. Thus Pennsylvania should be in play soon, as it should be, along with Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada and Arizona. Here’s more about Georgia:
A Dominion (software company) representative who has been scanning ballots in Floyd County, Georgia, appears to have worked as an official photographer for Kamala Harris’ campaign in 2019.
More than 3,000 votes, the majority of which were for Trump, went initially uncounted in the county.
Aric Thompson, Dominion representative and one of the men scanning ballots there, worked as an official photographer for Senator Harris in 2019, according to his LinkedIn profile. He even has a portfolio online with photos he took of her.
Additionally, there are reports that no observers were present for some of the scanning.
Real America’s Voice News reporter Heather Mullins tweeted about a photo, “This (Thompson) is one of 2 men scanning in ballots in Floyd County. He worked for Kamala Harris. According to Rome City Commissioner Democrat Wendy Davis, & Floyd County GOP Chair Luke Martin, no observers were present for some of the scanning. Over 3000 uncounted votes found.”
Mullins also shared social media posts from Thompson in which he bashed president Trump.
The Western Journal has more about fire-breathing attorney Sidney Powell:
Powell is clearly not playing games, having recently announced a lawsuit in Georgia that calls for the actual seizure of voting machines that were used during the election.
Powell’s lawsuit claims the use of Dominion voting software, “ballot stuffing” and other actions illegally gave Democrat Joe Biden a lead in the state.
It asks the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for an “emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be seized and impounded immediately for a forensic audit.”…
…“The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States,” the lawsuit says. “The fraud was executed by many means, but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned ‘ballot-stuffing.’ It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose.”
This is great. We should see thousands of machines tested randomly all over the country to prove the fraud. That will be the ‘smoking gun’ that we need. Here’s more from Powell’s report:
Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.)
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
Fake Virus Statistics Exposed
PJ Media reported:
Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has ‘Relatively No Effect on Deaths’ in U.S. Deleted After Publication
Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused (hundreds of thousands) of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.
Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University, critically analyzed (in the study) the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.
According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
Wait, what? Really?
That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.
Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.
So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
According to Briand, “The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals.”
Briand’s analysis found that the range of deaths amongst the older population has remained within the range of past years.
This is precisely what Nikitas3.com has been saying all along – that almost all of the reported China virus deaths in the US have been among elderly people who were sick and who were going to die anyway, while younger people (under age 60) who were not sick are hardly being affected. So the deaths of these elderly people would not be affecting overall death totals negatively. See the picture?
This is how the Fake News media have been deceiving us with misinformation and disinformation. And now we have a study to prove it, but the study was taken down almost immediately since it explained what the media don’t want us to know.
Minneapolis Residents May Sue City
Southernminn.com in Minnesota reported about the lack of police protection for citizens and businesses in the Minneapolis riots:
Minneapolis residents have standing to sue the city over an alleged police staffing violation, Hennepin County District Court Judge Jamie Anderson has ruled.
Anderson’s order rejected the city of Minneapolis’ attempt to throw out the lawsuit because the city said residents lacked standing to sue.
Anderson said he didn’t have enough information yet to decide on the outcome sought by plaintiffs.
Still, Anderson cited McKee v. Likins, in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held that “[t]axpayers are legitimately concerned with the performance by public officers of their public duties. Accordingly … a taxpayer suing as a taxpayer has standing to challenge administrative action which allegedly is rulemaking adopted without compliance with the statutory notice requirements.”
Eight Minneapolis residents sued the City Council and Mayor Jacob Frey in August, arguing they violated the charter requirement to staff roughly 743 officers for the 425,000-person city.
The lawsuit argues that the number of licensed police officers has dropped from 825 at the start of 2020 to about 634.
The lawsuit alleged city officials reduced police funding in 2020 by about $1.1 million during a police shortage following the death of George Floyd in police custody.
Anderson ruled city officials “have no authority to divert funds from the Minneapolis Police Department if they have not met their public duty to fund a police force of at least 0.0017 employees per resident.”
Good. These people should be sued for failing to protect the citizens of Minneapolis. They should be removed from office.