Top Hillary Aide Huma Abedin Linked to Militant Islam

Hillary Clinton’s top aide is a female named Huma Abedin who was born in the US but was raised for 16 years in Saudi Arabia, which is the global center for extremist Islam. If Hillary were to be elected president Abedin would probably become White House chief of staff. This would be very dangerous since Abedin’s family has been associated with radical Islam for decades.

Kenneth Timmerman wrote on Thehill.org, the website of The Hill, the Capitol Hill newspaper in Washington, the following about Abedin’s parents:

(Huma Abedin’s mother) Saleha Abedin, sits on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief, a group that is chaired by the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. … The evidence, in my opinion, is overwhelming: Huma Abedin is nothing short of a Muslim Brotherhood princess, born into an illustrious family of Brotherhood leaders. (Huma Abedin’s) father, Syed Zaynul Abedin, was a professor in Saudi Arabia who founded the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs, an institution established by the Government of Saudi Arabia with the support of the Muslim World League. The Muslim World League was “perhaps the most significant Muslim Brotherhood organization in the world,” according to former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy. Its then-General Secretary, Umar Nasif, founded the Rabita Trust, “which is formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization under American law due to its support of al Qaeda,” he wrote.

This is terrifying. Hillary must be kept out of the White House. Now here are excerpts from an article by Paul Sperry in the New York Post, from NYPost.com, about Huma Abedin herself. Each excerpt is followed by a Nikitas3.com comment:

Sperry writes: Huma continued to work for her mother’s journal through 2008. She is listed as “assistant editor” on the masthead of the 2002 issue in which her mother suggested the US was doomed to be attacked on 9/11 because of “sanctions” it leveled against Iraq and other “injustices” allegedly heaped on the Muslim world. Here is an excerpt: “The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.”

Nikitas3.com comment: Stunning. And this sounds like the American Democrat/media narrative since 9/11. No wonder Abedin works for Hillary. Because Hillary is a militant who in her heart believes that 9/11 was America’s fault, as Obama does, and as all Democrats do and as virtually all Muslims do.

Sperry writes: One of (Hillary) Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign website is her support for the UN women’s conference in Beijing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” … However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 (speech), as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton. …(Huma’s mother) opposed the UN conference widening the scope of the definition of the family to include “gay and lesbian ‘families.’ ”

Nikitas3.com comment: If Huma Abedin were in Donald Trump’s campaign Trump would be called every name in the book – sexist, anti-woman, anti-gay, etc. Huma Abedin is yet another Islamist agent inside the US government, this time at the very pinnacle of power. She is like the newly-elected Islamic mayor of London who now wants to crack down on internet chatter that is perceived to be anti-Muslim, i.e., limit Western freedom of speech when there is no freedom of speech at all in Islamic nations.

Sperry writes: In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women. “‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women. “By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.” “Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.”

Nikitas3.com comment: We conservatives and Christians also oppose the radical feminist agenda, but these “Islamic values” are just the start for the Muslims. We Christians believe in “family values” too but we do not want our women draped in black from head to toe or denied the right to go out of the house on their own or to drive cars. Yet Democrats in the US are now gravitating to both extremes – radical feminism on the one hand and radical Islam on the other. Meanwhile they pillory Christians for their views.

This is no surprise since liberals always see the world in extreme terms. We conservatives never go to these extremes. We see no value in either extreme; we apply moderation in everything. That is the basis for conservatism – moderation and common sense – and that is why extremists of every stripe, from communists on the extreme secular left to Islamists on the far religious right, hate our American liberty. Because our liberty by its very definition rejects all extremism.

(Please bookmark this website. And please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)

This entry was posted in Current Events (More than 1,000 previous editorials!) and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.