The discovery was as shocking as it was horrific: a camera with explicit photos of a child who attended Washington National Cathedral’s exclusive Beauvoir elementary school, which caters to some of the area’s most powerful families. The camera was assigned to third-grade teacher Eric Justin Toth. School head Paula Carreiro quickly summoned Toth that day in June 2008 and confronted him. She then had him escorted to the end of the cathedral driveway, ordering him away.

With that, she gave Toth a critical jump on police, unwittingly helping a man alleged to have a history of making child pornography. He is now one of the country’s most notorious fugitives — last month, the FBI put him on its Ten Most Wanted list, filling a spot left empty by Osama bin Laden’s death.

OK, so what does this mean?

First, rest assured that an elite Washington, DC private school like Beauvoir ($24,000 tuition) is full of liberals because the elite and wealthy culture of Washington is overwhelmingly ultra-liberal. Most elite private schools all across America are extremely liberal. Even many Catholic schools today are left wing.

Second, Carreiro ordered the pedophile away rather than calling the police immediately.

This just goes to show how child abuse, child pornography and child molesters have flourished in America in the last 50 years as permissive liberalism has become the norm – because the creeps have been ‘enabled’ by weaklings like Carreiro.

Was she in fact aiding Toth subliminally without even knowing it?

Of course. She could never have the guy arrested right before her eyes, no that would be too painful!

Instead this beast Toth surely has inflicted tons of pain on other kids since then because Carreiro was such a coward.

And then the same liberals decry the explosion of child molestation and the abuse of children and say we need more government programs to “help children”.

Baloney. That protest is fake. Because child molestation and everything else from adult-child sex to child kidnapping and murder, are a result of the low moral standards of the Democrat left. You never had this kind of widespread behavior when America was a more socially conservative nation back in the 1950s.

If such perverted sexual behaviors were suspected or detected by real conservatives, the molester would be called out and held for arrest. Or worse.

Here is a report from Associated Press about the famous 1979 disappearance of a child named Etan Patz:

Wearing a backpack, the boy with sandy hair and a toothy grin vanished May 25, 1979, while walking alone to his school bus stop for the first time, two blocks from his home in New York's SoHo neighborhood.

This is a reminder of the days when children actually used to walk alone, back when the Democrats say that America was an evil, conservative nation.

Not any more. The liberals have destroyed us and now tell us how great America is under their regime.

It is all a lie…

In liberal environments suspicious behaviors are often rationalized or explained away. Because political correctness does not allow the behavior to be scrutinized or questioned.

Washingtonpost.com also reported:

The FBI describes Toth as a crafty fugitive and child predator who will not stop until he is arrested. They call his methods typical for a pedophile: He worked where he had access to kids, ingratiated himself with families and got extended alone time with their children, sometimes as a tutor. Then he allegedly exploited children and took pictures of them for gratification.

Yes, because a child molester raises no suspicions among liberals. Because liberals think that raising questions about any kind of suspicious behavior is ‘judgmental’… unless that behavior includes something conservative like going to church on Sundays.

Washingtonpost.com reported:

(The Washington, DC private school) did not know about Toth’s past. Around 2001 and 2002, parents in Indiana were concerned that he was too close to children while volunteering at an elementary school there, according to the FBI. And years later, police found evidence of child pornography that Toth may have made while working as a counselor at an all-boys summer camp in Wisconsin from 2004 through 2006.

And why didn’t the DC school administrators know about Toth’s past?

Because under today’s politically-correct liberalism you cannot report any suspicious activities when called for job references or you will be sued for “discrimination” or some other liberal proscription.

If a teacher in Indiana was asked about Toth and replied, “We think Toth was involved in suspicious activities involving children” then that teacher would be sued for libel by some left-wing legal organization like ACLU, rest assured.

Because unless someone is arrested, tried and convicted, any ‘judgment’ can be termed discriminatory, according to liberalism. And even after conviction Democrats have made many laws to shield criminals from their pasts.

What is ‘evidence of child pornography that Toth may have made while working as a counselor at an all-boys summer camp in Wisconsin from 2004 through 2006.’? Did they find child porn? If so, why wasn’t this guy prosecuted?

Answer: Because some wealthy Democrat/ACLU lawyer from Chicago would defend Toth for free and bankrupt the summer camp with legal fees. This is how the hard left always works to enable the worst creeps to survive and prosper.

And this is how child molesters have exploded in numbers in the last 30 years especially – with the help of the Democrat party and other liberals.

The whole “Catholic church abuse scandal” was based on despicable activity by only a few hundred homosexual child-molester priests. And those priests often ended up in cahoots with Catholic church officials – some of them certainly homosexual – who allowed the abuse to happen.

Because liberalism is rampant in many American churches including many Catholic churches. And the price paid by tens of thousands of molestation victims, virtually all boys, has been enormous.

This is all a result of liberalism, friends, and its decadent moral standards. The same liberals who tell us they “care about” children and everyone else.

Baloney. Pure baloney

Roman Walter Sadlowski, US Navy, Born June 15, 1920, Died December 7, 1941 Who Gave His Life at Pearl Harbor in Defense of His Country. His Example Will Always Remain An Inspiration of Faithful Performance of Duty. Dedicated May 17, 1942

Who is Roman Walter Sadlowski? And why was this plaque specially made for him?

I have no answer to either question. All I can say is God bless the Roman Sadlowskis of the world. They made the ultimate sacrifice in America's War on Evil.

No, I do not know a thing about Roman. He was born one year before my father so perhaps I would have known his children if he had lived. But no, I have no real knowledge about him.

He probably was the son of immigrants as was my father, and so he is surely like someone who I would have known in my own family. Uncle Roman. Who died at Pearl Harbor.

If that had been my father there at Pearl Harbor instead of Roman Sadlowski, however, I would not be here today.

No, I know not a thing about Roman Sadlowski. But I do know that I owe him – a complete stranger – everything.

It is interesting that the plaque was dedicated so shortly after Roman died. Perhaps he was the first casualty of the war from my town. Perhaps the people had no idea how many more would pay the ultimate price in a war that many did not see coming, robbing us of our fathers and sons and uncles and nephews and grandfathers.

Every one of us has a Roman Walter Sadlowski to thank for our freedom. The rough statistics are that 25,000 Americans died in the Revolution. 630,000 total on both sides died in the Civil War. 120,000 died in World War I. 430,000 died in World War II. 33,000 died in the ‘forgotten’ Korean War. 58,000 died in Vietnam. 4,486 in Iraq. And now 1,980 in Afghanistan.

So for each of us living in freedom today we have one part of our soul invested in each Roman Walter Sadlowski.

Was Roman a member of a family with brothers and sisters? Are his brothers and sisters and nieces and nephews and other descendants alive today? There surely could be some family members around town with one of those old black-and-white pictures of Roman upon entry into the Navy, like millions of guys who joined.

What was Roman's goal in his short life? After all, he died very young, only 21.

I have no idea.

Since he was born in 1920 he probably had a pretty good youth during the Roaring 20s but his teenage years were lived during the depression of the 1930s. Perhaps he enlisted in order to get away from the problems in the economy. Perhaps he was just a patriotic soul who wanted to serve his country. Who knows?

I certainly don’t. I never knew Roman.

Indeed few of us know much about those who have died for our freedom except for those in our direct family. Like Uncle Roman who died in the war. Whose black-and-white enlistment picture is there on the dining room wall.

No, for tens of millions of us, those who perished in service are an abstraction. Most died little known, just ordinary citizens living ordinary lives and dying in the most extraordinary fashion, defending the precious freedom that the rest of us enjoy.

Oh, sure there is the occasional Pat Tillman, the famous football player who went to Afghanistan and who was killed there, and who is known to many. But most of our heroes have passed quietly into eternity, having lost the opportunity to fulfill their dreams like I have been able to fulfill mine. Because they fought for my freedom to do so.

We see their pictures occasionally on television, or read their names on memorial plaques and monuments. We see their photos even today, having died recently in Iraq or Afghanistan. And then they are gone. We do not know them. Their loss belongs to their families, a loss that the rest of us will never bear and their families always will.

But how could we possibly know them? After all, they were just guys who went into battle and died. There is no way that we can remember them all.

No, I did not know much about Roman. But I will hold him in my heart. I will “adopt” him as my ‘freedom guard’. Which each of us should do.

Indeed, every American should visit a war memorial this Monday and write down the name of one fallen soldier not known to us. And keep that name close to your heart. Because he gave his life so that we could have ours.

In the meantime, the best way to honor them all is to attend a Memorial Day parade and services. And think hard, that if they had not served and died that the day would not be necessary in the first place. And that we would not be enjoying our freedom.

Roman Walter Sadlowski. May he rest in peace. And may God bless him and all the others like him who have served our nation boldly.

This quote shows once again that Obama is going to run a largely negative campaign.  But what this really shows is that Obama has no positive news for the American people.

Yet Democrats and the Media Left have been telling us for years now that nobody wants negativity. This of course was simply intended to muzzle Republicans and conservatives who wish to criticize Obama and the Democrats. Meanwhile a vicious attack-dog Democrat like black US congresswoman Maxine Waters calls Republicans (white people) “demons”.

Romney is wisely going after Obama every day using both a positive strategy about his own abilities and vision, and a negative attack strategy on Obama’s failures. This is a winning strategy. Romney is emulating Ronald Reagan’s strategy against Jimmy Carter.

Obama is headed for disaster with his Bain-heavy attack campaign. Because it means that he is tacking to the angry left and not to the political center where it is said over and over that campaigns are decided.

Yet Obama already has the left sewed up. So what this really shows is that Obama is truly a radical at heart. And, more significantly, that he is very likely throwing in the towel on his re-election. More and more people are saying that Romney is going to win in November.

Nikitas3.com believes that Obama can see the numbers and has already given up psychologically on his re-election. The only thing yet to be revealed is how many Democrats he drags down with him. And it could be the whole party across the entire nation from the federal level down to the state and local level, as happened in the November 2010 election.

This could be another major disaster for Obama and for his party. Even nervous Democrats are calling his attacks on Bain “nauseating” and “crap” (Newark, New Jersey mayor Cory Booker) and “disappointing” (former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell).

Booker and Rendell are trying to warn Obama that he is taking the Democrat party over a cliff. And don’t think that Democrats across the nation are not all thinking the same thing and are not in a full-blown panic. Because they have seen the polls like the one that showed more than 70% of Americans think that the nation is on the Wrong Track.

With these types of numbers Obama cannot win. And it is important to remember that since Obama was inaugurated that just about every possible election that could go Republican has. Even Obama’s own former US Senate seat went to Republican Mark Kirk in November 2010, while Republican Scott Brown in January 2010 won the Massachusetts US Senate seat occupied by the Kennedy family for decades.

Democrats see this and now they are shuddering every time there is an election. Look at what happened in West Virginia recently. The Christian Science Monitor reported on csmonitor.com:

In an embarrassment to President Obama, Federal Inmate No. 11593-051 – otherwise known as Keith Judd – won 10 counties and 41 percent of the vote in West Virginia’s Democratic presidential primary Tuesday (May 8).

Mr. Judd is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas where he is serving a 210-month sentence for extortion, according to The Charleston (W.Va.) Gazette. Judd had paid the $2,500 filing fee and submitted a notarized “certificate of announcement” to appear on the ballot.

Wow. Kaboom. This is for real. A federal inmate won 10 counties over Obama in West Virginia in a Democrat primary. If this type of thing had happened to a Republican in a Republican primary the Media Left would declare that Republican positively, utterly unelectable. But they are trying to bury this story and are giving Obama every benefit of every doubt despite the increasingly negative and desperate tone of his campaign.

Meanwhile on May 22 John Wolfe, an unknown Tennessee lawyer on the Democrat presidential primary ballot in Arkansas, also won 41% of the vote against Obama…

This is a double disaster for Obama. Rest assured that the Democrats are in full meltdown mode, which the Media Left are dutifully covering up.

Indeed with this type of news coming out every day and with the Obama campaign only focusing on attacking “the rich” and offering no compelling narrative for Obama’s re-election, then Romney will win handily.

But Obama has stuck to his class warfare strategy religiously. Because he has nothing else to say and he is at heart a radical. Listen to this excerpt about free-market capitalism from Obama’s speech on December 6, 2011 at Osawatomie, Kansas:

“It’s a simple theory – one that speaks to our rugged individualism and healthy skepticism of too much government. It fits well on a bumper sticker. Here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It’s never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible post-war boom of the 50s and 60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade.”

This is amazing. Obama is essentially trashing our history, saying that our nation has never functioned, that we have never served as the economic engine of the globe, saved liberty over and over through our military might, provided massive assistance to poor nations, served as a beacon of hope for two centuries of immigrants, or developed and given to the world for free every single technology that powers the global economy today.

Indeed Obama only sees a negative in America and in capitalism while he himself was nothing but a community organizer who created no wealth but only undermined wealth and job creation with his radical ideas and activities.

Obama will be a one-term president and he knows it. And he probably does not really care. First, his wife hates the White House. Second, he has gotten a national health insurance plan through and further socialized the economy. And third, he now is going to cash in big in his post presidency.

Then after the Democrats are routed Hillary Clinton and her husband will swoop down to pick up the Democrat party’s pieces for 2016. And Hillary’s success will depend on how well Romney does in fixing this very broken nation.

WASHINGTON — After years of speculation, estimates and projections, the Census Bureau has made it official: White births are no longer a majority in the United States.

Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 49.6 percent of all births in the 12-month period that ended last July, according to Census Bureau data made public on Thursday, while minorities — including Hispanics, blacks, Asians and those of mixed race — reached 50.4 percent, representing a majority for the first time in the country’s history.

Such a turn has been long expected, but no one was certain when the moment would arrive — signaling a milestone for a nation whose government was founded by white Europeans and has wrestled mightily with issues of race, from the days of slavery, through a civil war, bitter civil rights battles and, most recently, highly charged debates over efforts to restrict immigration.

Meanwhile Associated Press reported in Autumn 2011:

‘WASHINGTON (AP) – For the first time, minorities make up a majority of babies in the U.S., part of a sweeping race change and growing age divide between mostly white, older Americans and predominantly minority youths that could reshape government policies.

Preliminary census estimates also show the share of African-American households headed by women – made up of mostly single mothers – now exceeds African-American households with married couples, a sign of declining U.S. marriages overall but also continuing challenges for black youths without involved fathers.’

So what does all this mean?

Of course conservative white Americans are supposed to be alarmed that blacks, Asians, Hispanics and other ‘minorities’ are rising in numbers and that they will make the nation irreversibly liberal.

But there are many dimensions to this story:

*The Democrats are going gaga over this news. Because they think that they can finally see the time when they can take control of a poorer and poorer nation with more non-whites, more government dependency and fewer productive white people to bolster conservatism and self-reliance.

This is classic liberalism – poorer is better. Just look at the economies in the states with the most liberal policies and the most belligerent and aggressive minority populations like New York, Massachusetts and California and you see the states with the worst economies. Because productive white people are leaving these states and have been for years.

*In the overall demographic picture, however, the white people who are having the fewest children are all generally on the political left – homosexuals, urbanites, artists, college professors, feminists, social activists, environmentalists, ‘occupy Wall Street’ types etc. Al Gore has suggested that we all have fewer children, which we conservatives pray that all white environmentalists will heed.

So in other words as whites decline in proportion then that is a positive thing for America if they are liberals who are declining. Meanwhile conservatives and Christians statistically have more children than liberals.

*The other concern is that hispanics are going to rise up in numbers and take over the nation. And indeed their numbers are rising.

But then again many Americans were terrified of the Irish immigration in the 19^th century and then of the Greeks, Italians and Eastern Europeans who flooded into America in the early 20th century.

Yet we all survived. And prospered. Because it is not the people that determine the well-being of the nation but the policies.

In fact during the depression of the 1930s you might have assumed that conservatism would never come back. Yet the 1950s, 1980s and even today are times of conservative ascendancy even though the white population has been proportionally shrinking for years. Look at the 2010 election which was a landslide for conservatism, or even the period after the 2000 election when we had a Republican president, House and Senate. We well could have all three again after November.

Reported AP:

'"We're moving toward an acknowledgment that we're living in a different world than the 1950s, where married or two-parent heterosexual couples are now no longer the norm for a lot of kids, especially kids of color," said Laura Speer, coordinator of the Kids Count project for the Baltimore-based Annie E. Casey Foundation.'

*These statistics say that many blacks are spiraling down into worse circumstances, not improving themselves. And this part is bad news for black America and bad news for America in general. Because blacks commit large amounts of crime and are heavily dependent on the government. And they are destroying themselves at the same time. This is a result of their liberal allegiances.

*What about hispanics? Should white people fear their increasing numbers?

No.  First many hispanics have not been undermined by the Media Left in America (rock music, rap music, trash TV, Follywood, pornography, homosexuality etc.). Many do not even speak English to understand it so they still believe in traditional values.

In fact decent white people should fear the lunatic caucasians in the Media Left more than hispanics, any day.

Ronald Reagan once said that “hispanics are Republicans but they may not even know it.” What he meant was that hispanics embrace the traits that Republicans embrace – hard work, family, marriage and religion.

*Asians are included in the ‘minority’ calculation. And despite their proclivity for liberalism they are also hard-working and disciplined people who are contributing much to our nation.

*Many of the ‘minority’ births are to other immigrants who have a strong work ethic and a love of America. This is a good thing.

*It is also important to remember that dire population projections have often been wrong in the past. The most famous population mis-projection was the claim by Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) that populations would be checked by famine and disease and that man would be restricted because the world would run out of land to feed all the horses, oxen, mules etc. necessary to man’s survival (for transportation, for pulling plows in agricultural work etc.)

*In another unexpected trend recently, statistics show that some Mexicans are actually leaving the US and returning to Mexico because of the bad American economy.

But the fact remains that the white population is stagnating. Why? What has caused the white population to stagnate after the baby boom of post-World War II America seemed to point toward an ever-growing white population?

Many reasons, all emanating from the political left:

*The assault by the Media Left on white people. It started in the 1960s when tens of millions in the young white baby-boom ‘hippie’ generation were told that their parents were evil and stupid and that the white race is a worldwide oppressor. TV shows like All In the Family mocked hard-working white people, portraying them as bigots and idiots.

*The advocacy of wild drug use by the 'hippies' in the 1960s and beyond has destroyed millions of white youths and turned them into wackos. These people either were destroyed or today have become crazed environmentalists or ‘occupy Wall Street’ protesters.

*The rise of feminism and its intense and never-ending assaults on the family and on white men, and its hatred of children as manifested in its wholehearted supported for every abortion practice imaginable.

*The rise of the radical left in academia and its anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-Western, and anti-children agenda.

*The undermining of white people’s (mostly white men’s) confidence through relentless media assaults like endless TV commercials that portray white men as bumbling idiots. This leads to mental illnesses, confusion, depression, lack of opportunity, and an inability to function in society. White men also have been stripped of economic opportunity by affirmative action, leading them to shun the responsibility of children and family.

*The rise of black power – often violent – and its anti-white agenda, even though the same black-power movement is destroying black America itself.

*The rise of a Slacker Culture advocated by shows like Jersey Shore and networks like MTV which suggest that a responsible and serious life is peripheral.

*The rise of childless homosexuality and its hetero-phobia, and its relentless attacks on married people and Christianity, its rejection of children and its anything-goes lifestyle which has spread disease and death throughout the gay community.

*The Democrat left’s War on Marriage which is intended to undermine the nuclear family as a source of stability, with whites as the primary victims.

*The free-sex culture promoted by the left has destroyed marriage and the family unit.

*The left's War on Christianity, the faith that has traditionally been the source for family-centered and child-centered concerns for millennia.

*The undermining of the American economy with debt, which offers less and less opportunity for white people who have been the backbone of our economic innovation and growth.

*The gouging of American families by exorbitant college tuition charges, making families hesitant to have many children. Those tuitions have risen at roughly three times the rate of inflation over the last 30 years.

The Friday, May 18 offering bombed out. It finished only 23 cents above the initial price ($38 a share) while all the ‘experts’ were expecting massive gains. Facebook stock faded in trading on Monday, May 21.

So what is the lesson to be learned in this?

Well, think back to 2001. Remember the Segway, the stand-up scooter? Before it was unveiled the Segway was being touted as the most revolutionary thing since the automobile. It was hyped for months and it was being suggested that within just a few years that every world citizen would have a Segway.

Yet any rational person could see that the Segway is an expensive (various prices on the internet say they cost from $2,000 to $5,000. Segway’s own site does not even list a price.) and frivolous piece of technology. And on top of having limited usefulness, the Segway is unsafe. A famous photo of president George W. Bush falling off a Segway in 2003 was a public-relations disaster.

The Segway ultimately has bombed. Only about 60,000 Segways have been sold and most of them have been novelty purchases, generally by wealthy people with extra cash on their hands.

OK, so what does the similar stock market flop say about the much-hyped Facebook?

It speaks volumes. Because Facebook is a metaphor for where our nation is going. Because today we are all hyped up on nothing like the Segway and Facebook which is merely an internet site.

Facebook is an example of how many people make money in America today. We have more and more of a media-based economy – computers, social networks, telecommunications, cable TV, movies, entertainment etc.

In other words instead of “making things” in manufacturing like steel we are “reading” things and “looking at” things. Rather than making furniture or cars, for instance, we are addicted to words and images on an internet site while we import furniture from China.

Then when some stupid idea like the Segway or the Chevy Volt comes along or ineffective solar panels are hyped by the environmentalists and subsidized by the government, the Media Left treat them like they are economic saviors. Meanwhile genuine manufacturing of sensible and useful products is pushed from our shores.

In an analysis in Spring 2011 in The Wall Street Journal online edition called  We’ve Become a Nation of Takers, not Makers, Stephen Moore explains why our nation is in such economic straits.

Moore says that the number of people working for government today on every level has increased dramatically since 1960 from 8.7 million to 22.5 million. Yet at the same time the number of people involved in manufacturing has actually declined from the 1960 level of 15 million to 11.5 million today.

So today we have declining wealth creation because you create wealth when you ‘make things’, i.e., take resources from the ground and turn them into valuable products.

Yet Moore’s figures show that our unproductive government class is expanding while we do less and less manufacturing and instead focus more on more on silly internet sites like Facebook that make a select few wealthy.

Oh, sure, Facebook is a means of increasing commerce in some peripheral ways. But it is not an essential tool for creating wealth that our nation needs to prosper like manufacturing steel or cars or furniture or textiles.

So the Facebook IPO bomb is perhaps a harbinger for our nation, i.e., that we should stop idolizing people who get rich making computer apps to send your dog’s electrocardiogram to your cell phone and start again to manufacture useful things here in the USA to increase wealth and prosperity for all.

How?

Easy. Get the Democrats out of power, that’s how. They are blocking our prosperity in five crucial ways. They have in many, many cases made manufacturing too expensive here in the US through excessive taxes and regulations, labor union agitation, environmental restrictions and lawsuits from the trial lawyers.

Imagine trying to start a furniture company using local wood. The environmentalists would do everything they can to stop you from cutting down trees. Just for starters.

One example of thousands: Up in western Massachusetts, in just one county of only 140,000 people, 400 valuable manufacturing jobs in the paper industry were closed down in 2008 because ‘green’ energy policies had pushed up the price of electricity such that the companies decided to relocate the jobs to where electricity is more affordable.

Yet Obama said in his first election campaign that electricity rates would “necessarily skyrocket” under his ‘green’ policies. And they indeed are skyrocketing in some states after years of environmentalist pressure. Meanwhile the media liberals in Massachusetts have made no mention of how the state’s ‘green’ policies killed those jobs. They are too busy talking about Trayvon Martin and birth control for college girls.

And you can rest assured that the young multi-billionaire who founded Facebook, who is a big Obama supporter, gives lots of money to ‘green’ causes.

So those paper mill workers are lucky to have Facebook to keep them busy as they do nothing all day and collect welfare!

Isn’t Facebook wonderful!!

Except that the Hummer had an Obama bumper sticker on it.

Have you ever noticed how often elite cars – expensive BMWs and SUVs and others – proudly display Obama stickers or their owners proudly support Obama. And how few of those cars have Republican bumper stickers?

At least in New England that is true, particularly within 150 miles of New York City where I live, where New Yorkers come to vacation. And it is true anywhere near any American city where the liberals congregate or push their ideas on the people.

This is because of the Media Left’s relentless war on Republicans and conservatives, media love for Obama, and media advocacy of the false notion that Democrats are The Party of the People. And The Party of The Environment. And The Party of The Poor. And The Party of Equality. And all that nonsense.

When in fact it is conservatism and capitalism that stand for all these causes once you get past the falsehoods and misrepresentations of the left.

But no, according to media lore rich Republicans should never ever flaunt their ill-gotten wealth like big cars because then they will be seen as greedy ‘robber barons’ out to crush the Little People.  Put an Obama sticker on your Rolls-Royce, however, and you, sir, are a hero. Because Democrats stand for the common man!

Or so goes the leftist malarkey. And it is the opposite of the truth…

Consider that Hummer. The theory is that the owner probably has a lot of money, which would normally make him a Bad Person to Democrats and the media. But he supports Obama. So the theory goes that he is really a Good Person.

And rest assured that the owner takes it as a badge of honor to have that Obama sticker. He thinks it makes him “cool” among the 'hip' folks that always vote Democrat like rock stars and Follywod actors and artists and novelists. "See, I'm rich but I love Obama!" he is shouting. "I care about everyone!"

But the underlying reality is that the Hummer owner and his rich liberal cronies are simply people who love money and who want to stay wealthy. So he votes for Obama and other Democrats who insure that he stays rich while everyone else gets poor.

Oh, no! say the liberals. That is backwards! We Democrats hate rich people! We want to tax them! We are PROUD to be Obama supporters and helping the poor! We want to redistribute the wealth and make society more just!

Nonsense. Utter rubbish. After 50 years of ever-increasing government  handouts, we have more poor people than ever. Because when the government subsidizes poor people, you get more of them. Period.

Meanwhile today Democrats are easily the majority of rich people and super-rich people in America. In many wealthy precincts like New York City, San Francisco, Silicon Valley and Martha's Vineyard there's hardly a Republican in sight. And libs get richer and richer as the rest of America gets poorer. How? Consider these roads to riches for Democrats as the rest of us suffer as Democrats push wealth-creating manufacturing from our shores:

*Liberals make huge amounts of “paper wealth” in the cities, manipulating stocks, bonds and other certificates. This does not ‘create wealth’ for the rest of America, but only ’services wealth’ and  ‘transfers wealth’ to people in urban areas, many of them liberals. The majority of people even on Wall Street today are Democrats. Chelsea Clinton famously worked for a wealthy hedge fund in New York City run by a Democrat billionaire who was a friend of her father.

*Democrats accumulate wealth through media and the arts – newspapers, entertainment, advertising, Follywood, TV, fashion, Broadway etc. No conservatives need apply. And those media are stridently anti-conservative, anti-white, anti-traditional-values, anti-business, anti-marriage and anti-Christian. Obama bumper sticker on the Beemer? Of course.

*They work as trial lawyers, setting up offices in big cities. They file lawsuits against private profit-making companies, often putting them out of business and pushing up the cost of operating for others, killing jobs and opportunity for the rest of us. They make huge amounts of money and give their campaign contributions to the Democrats who then make laws protecting trial lawyers.

*Democrats accumulate wealth through the acquisition of taxpayer money. Government on the federal, state and local level is a $6+ trillion "business" and many liberals use their business connections and political connections with the Democrat party to corral a chunk of that money. If you wonder why the notorious Big Dig highway project in Boston, Massachusetts went from $2 billion to $15 billion, look no further than the Democrats who have controlled Massachusetts for decades. That money largely was stolen by labor unions and companies connected to the state’s Democrats. Then we "little people" are strangled with taxes to pay for it all.

*Liberals accumulate wealth through labor unions. Many very wealthy labor bosses are multi-millionaires but act as if they are just simple people working for “the common man”. This is baloney. Many union activists even lower down are very well-off people. They have Obama bumper stickers on their union-made Cadillacs while their policies kill entire industries and throw millions out of work as happened regularly throughout the 1950s, 1960s and onward.

*Many ultra-wealthy liberals get wealth through nefarious means like currency speculation, as George Soros does. This does not create wealth and jobs for others, but only for Soros, by the billions. Or Al Gore accumulated a $100 million fortune building political and economic power giving his ‘global warming’ speeches as his enviro policies ruin the economy for millions. And you can expect Gore to have an Obama bumper sticker on his big gas-guzzling SUV or an Obama campaign sign on the lawn of his energy-guzzling mansions.

*Rich liberals often inherit wealth like the Kennedys did or they marry into wealth like Democrat US senator John Kerry of Massachusetts. This is one of the key sources for new recruits to liberalism. People who inherit wealth or marry into money often become liberals because they know nothing about the hard work involved in wealth creation. So they become redistributionists and wish to see wealth spread around. The Kennedys are a perfect example. "Rich kids" are notoriously liberal. And since they want to keep their money but be accepted by 'hip' society and particularly by the media, they become strident leftists while imposing job-killing socialism on the rest of us.

*The tax returns of rich liberals are overlooked by the Internal Revenue Service which is yet another government agency run by the Democrat party, as are all the bureaucracies in Washington. Meanwhile IRS harasses rich Republicans.

*And finally it is significant to remember that rich liberals are praised and celebrated in the Media Left, while rich Republicans and conservatives are harangued and belittled. So you can choose your destiny by what bumper sticker you put on your Hummer. And what you choose to believe and who you associate with.

So the rich snob asks, "You like that Obama bumper sticker on my Jaguar? Yes, I am really cool. I am for 'the common man'. Wow. Look at me! I'm a liberal!!"

This creates a well-rounded candidacy. Because if the candidate is only AGAINST issues or the opposing candidate, then we do not know what he/she proposes for a solution. If he/she is only FOR issues, then we see him/her as timid and afraid to confront his/her opponent and their issues.

Now we have Mitt Romney starting his campaign. Already we have seen Romney making blunt criticisms of Obama. Because Romney clearly is taking a page from the Ronald Reagan campaign of 1980 in which Reagan savaged Jimmy Carter and won in a landslide.

For instance Romney has said directly that Obama should “suck it up” and stop playing golf and get focused on the nation’s problems.

Good. This is bold language that a creampuff like McCain never would have used. And expect Romney to continue in this vein. When commenting on Obama’s campaign slogan ‘Forward’, Romney retorted: “Forward, what, over the cliff!?”

Excellent. He is even mocking the sanctimonious Obama. This terrifies the Democrats. They want a timid McCain-type candidate who is afraid to criticize Obama because Obama is (half) black.

Now Romney has rolled out his first national campaign ad, a TV ad in several crucial battleground states, and the ad is called ‘Day One’. The ad says what Romney will do on the first day of his presidency:

“President Romney immediately approves the Keystone pipeline, creating thousands of jobs that Obama blocked…  President Romney introduces tax cuts and reforms that reward job creators, not punish them… President Romney issues order to begin replacing Obamacare with commonsense health care reform. That’s what a Romney presidency will be like."

Wow. Kaboom. So Romney is doing several smart things. First the ad is calling him “President Romney”. This is a good psychological tactic. We have not heard that phrase before. And this is happening as Americans are focusing on him and as his polls are rising.

Second he is telling us directly and without hesitation what he plans to do in just a few short sentences.

Third, the ad speaks in the present tense – “President Romney immediately approves the Keystone pipeline” – as if to suggest that he already is president. Smart thinking.

Fourth, the ad’s boldness and directness has attracted national attention and so has produced much more political ‘buzz’ than a bland, boilerplate ad.

(Another brilliant Romney campaign stroke is the National Debt Clock that he is going to bring to every campaign event. The sight of that debt figure increasing every second is a great prop for Romney to clobber Obama with.)

Notice that each sentence in the Romney TV ad has in it both a positive element (what Romney will do) and a negative (how Obama has hurt us). Here are the three sentences (positive in italics, negative in bold):

*President Romney immediately approves the Keystone pipeline, creating thousands of jobs that Obama blocked… 

*President Romney introduces tax cuts and reforms that reward job creators, not punish them…

*President Romney issues order to begin replacing Obamacare with commonsense health care reform.

Awesome. Romney obviously has a very good campaign consultant doing his ads. This ad is a very strong initial punch at Obama, even calling it ‘Obamacare’, which angers Democrats. And rest assured that this is just the beginning.

Even the Media Left are admitting the strength of the Romney ad. Said washingtonpost.com:

In his first television advertisement of the general election, Romney is reinforcing his focus on the economy while attacking two of Obama’s more polarizing policies in a nod to skeptical conservatives …The positive tone is a stark contrast to the latest ad from Obama’s re-election campaign, which attacks Romney’s business career.

So even the libs are noting Obama’s negative tone. But then expectedly washingtonpost.com starts doubting Romney:

But Romney’s ad oversimplifies complicated issues and exaggerates his potential influence as president. He’s outlining plans he can’t accomplish on his first day in office without significant cooperation from parties beyond his control. The narrator promises Romney would issue an order “to begin replacing Obamacare” on his first day in office. While he sometimes gets big cheers on the campaign trail by promising to repeal the law, Romney knows he cannot do away with Obama’s landmark health care bill on his own.

Yes, we know that. But you have to start somewhere and the libs are terrified that Romney even plans to start. Because for the first time in history we are actually going to seek to roll back and then eliminate a government program with many more to come under Romney. This horrifies liberals who are used to those programs growing and growing every year.

Yet in contrast, when Obama said outright during his campaign in 2008 that electricity prices will “necessarily skyrocket” under his ‘green’ policies, those same skeptical media said virtually nothing. Because they actually support higher energy costs.

Meanwhile the ‘experts’ at washingtonpost.com warn sternly:

Finally, Romney’s promise to introduce tax cuts that “reward job creators” oversimplifies a plan that could have huge ramifications for the nation’s taxpayers. Tax cuts would add to the federal deficit, which Romney has vowed to shrink. He says any tax cuts would be paid for by closing certain deductions and loopholes but has refused to provide any details on plans that may ultimately affect popular deductions like those on mortgage interest.

This, of course, ignores history that shows that in every single instance, without exception, that high taxes thwart economic growth and that low taxes help growth.

In fact there are only three things keeping the American economy afloat in 2012:

*The lower Bush-era tax rates are still in effect, surprisingly voted by the Democrat Congress and signed by Obama in December 2010. These will expire at the end of 2012.

*A Social Security tax ‘holiday’ is allowing Americans to keep more than $100 billion instead of paying it into SS. This also is helping the economy somewhat but it is draining Social Security.

*The election of a tidal wave of Republicans to state and federal offices in November 2010 offered a boost to business confidence.

Puzzling break-ins over the last month at the offices of at least three House members and several committees have U.S. Capitol Police gumshoes working to find a pattern and the culprits, with missing items ranging from cash and expensive computer equipment to autographed baseballs and alcohol. In at least four of the cases, thieves broke into the offices at night when doors were locked, leading some staffers to believe they were victims of an inside job.

 “The evidence points to someone with access to my office, and other offices in the Capitol complex, as the perpetrator,” freshman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., surmised in a letter to the House’s Office of the Chief Administrative Officer.

Other offices hit… include those of Reps. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., and Jon Runyan, R-N.J.

OK, the three victims are all Republicans, right? And the other side of the coin is that the staff that runs the US Capitol (administrative, security, maintenance, janitorial etc.) is surely made up mostly of liberal unionized Democrat government employees.

In other words, this was an inside job, friends. With Republicans targeted even in the halls of Congress.

Meanwhile standard.net reported recently:

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Rush Limbaugh was officially inducted… into the Hall of Famous Missourians. But Democrats are still hopeful his bronze bust will never be on display alongside those of Harry Truman, Mark Twain and Walt Disney.

Now look at these two sentences (note italicized segment):

The conservative radio talk show host was inducted in a state Capitol ceremony. But in a break from tradition, the public and Democratic lawmakers were not allowed into the chambers of the House of Representatives, which were locked and guarded by armed members of the Missouri Highway Patrol while the ceremony took place.

So what do these two stories have in common?

They represent the ongoing targeting of Republicans and conservatives by liberals and Democrats. Any time a Republican or conservative is recognized or honored or is just doing his/her job, he/she is targeted by the Democrat left for some type of protest.

Imagine that… police protection was needed for a public ceremony involving a broadcaster who is acting completely within the law on his job.  Dreadful. But that is what you get when angry Democrats are involved. Meanwhile US Capitol police are confounded as Republicans’ offices are robbed right under their noses.

This shows that American freedom today has become a one-way street. The increasingly radical Democrats are ignoring the respect that our Constitutional republic is supposed to tolerate for all points of view.

Just look at the ‘occupy Wall Street’ movement. They were supposed to be the Democrats’ answer to the Tea Parties. And while the Tea Parties are law-abiding people the media have tried to fabricate many negative stories about them.

For instance when Tea Partiers went to Washington to protest the ObamaCare bill the media printed a nationwide story and made it news for days that a Tea Partier had shouted racial epithets at a black congressman even though there never was one shred of evidence produced of the epithets.

Yet when the ‘occupiers’ camped out illegally in public parks, used the streets as their bathrooms, committed murder, rape and suicide, shut down businesses, stole things, started fires, threatened people, damaged property and fought with police Democrats like Nancy Pelosi said “God bless them…” and the Media Left tried to prop them up with every possible type of positive coverage.

See the double standard? And why is this happening?

Because the Democrat left and much of the American media have been taken over by radicals who act in extremist ways. That is why the Democrats today are being viewed as a shrinking party that caters only to blacks and other minority and extreme viewpoints.

In Wisconsin union protesters did hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to the state capitol building and its grounds in protesting Republican governor Scott Walker’s fiscal reforms that took power away from public employee unions. Protesters even rallied outside the private residences of Republican Wisconsin lawmakers, an obvious act of intimidation that leftist groups use frequently.

How many of these types of damaging and intimidating protests do you see by Republicans and conservatives?

Answer: Zero. Because we conservatives abide by the law.

When black mobs beat innocent white people in places like Wisconsin and Virginia the police virtually ignored the violence and in several cases refused to even take statements from the victims.

Why?

Because many police today are on the unionized, Democrat left and carry out a liberal agenda that is pro-black. This includes covering up black violence.

Here is another example out of thousands: Pictures posted on the internet after Earth Day 2012 showed that the environmentalists who had rallied in a park in San Francisco had left a mountain of garbage behind. The Media Left ignored the garbage.

This is typical. Bad behavior is endemic on the Democrat left and then it is dismissed or ignored by their media allies.  But if one single Tea Partier accidentally drops a candy wrapper onto the ground, it is national news.

When Rush Limbaugh called a birth-control advocate “a slut” on his radio show, he apologized. But when left-wing TV comedian Bill Maher called Christians “stupid” – an attack not on an individual but on tens of millions of good people – he never apologized.

Yet Maher has not been targeted relentlessly like Limbaugh has. See the double standard, even though Limbaugh apologized?

Here’s another issue: Where is all the voter fraud in America?

Oh, sure, you have the occasional isolated case on the Republican side. But we know that 99% of fraud is on the Democrat left. For instance, while Democrat attorney general Eric Holder says there is no problem with voter fraud, a ‘sting’ video showed a young actor going into a Washington, DC polling place and being offered Holder’s very own ballot without having to prove that he was Holder by showing an ID.

This no-ID-required system allows widespread voter fraud that is virtually all Democrat in nature. In fact three very important elections in the last 10 years that chose Democrats – for the governorship of Washington state in 2004; for the US Senate in South Dakota in 2002; and for the US Senate in Minnesota in 2008 – all had strong evidence of voter fraud when the margin of victory was very small. But since it could not be proven conclusively the elections were allowed to stand.

Then when Republican George W. Bush won the 2000 presidential election fair and square by winning the Florida electoral vote by a small margin, Democrat crybabies took to the media for years afterward despite the fact that count after recount showed Bush the winner.

Meanwhile Republican candidate Richard Nixon knew, and the whole nation knew, that the Democrats and the Kennedy family had blatantly stolen the presidential election of 1960 for John F. Kennedy.

Did Nixon complain for years on end?

No, he took it like a man. Like Democrats never do.

CNN.com reported:

Her death is the latest for a family that has seen its share of tragedy.

Yes, yes, we know, we know. Tragedy, tragedy, tragedy. But perhaps the media might note just once that Kennedy behavior brings on much of the Kennedy tragedy.

Here is a report from RadarOnline.com

Another source, close to Robert (F. Kennedy) tells RadarOnline.com: "Mary was in a very dark place recently. Robert tried to help her all he could but it was difficult (for) him to be around her. Robert is committed to his sobriety but Mary had chosen a whole different path to take."

In other words Robert Kennedy and his estranged wife were alcoholics. She apparently was a drug abuser too. And we all know that bad things happen to alcoholics and drug abusers who cannot fix themselves.

Do you remember that George W. Bush was an alcoholic in his younger years? Yet he overcame it. Because strong people can overcome their addictions and demons. Weak people cannot.

Mary Kennedy is reported to have hanged herself in a barn on her elegant estate in a wealthy suburb of New York City. Perhaps she could have gone somewhere else to end her life so that her children might not find her. Her four children were only in their teen and pre-teen years.

This is utterly creepy. But what else can you expect when it is connected to the Kennedys?

So why would a mother of four kill herself instead of living for her children?

For starters Mary Kennedy was reported to have been very depressed because she was in the process of being divorced from her husband who is being described as a “philanderer”. This is classic Kennedy behavior: Destroy the wife.

Yet we are told over and over that Democrats are all such wonderful feminists! Always concerned about “women”!

Yeah, right…

And second Mary Kennedy killed herself because she did not care about anyone except herself. Because suicide is a selfish act by selfish people. And suicide is much, much more common on the Democrat left than among conservatives among whom it is largely unheard of.

Imagine leaving four children behind… What kind of person would do that?

Answer: A person who had been pulled into the dark Kennedy orbit.

So again we have had the Kennedys, who cannot even control themselves, telling us all for decades what to do with our lives through their political power and their big-government philosophy.

Why don’t they straighten out themselves first?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a big environmentalist. Should we be heeding someone and making policies recommended by someone with such a troubled history?

No. This guy even has said that people who disagree with his ‘global warming’ alarmism are “traitors”.

This is the rumination of a tyrannical mind. This is hate speech and threats directed at those of us who are rational from someone who clearly is not.

CNN.com reported:

The couple married in a civil ceremony in 1994 when Mary Richardson, a designer, was six months pregnant, according to the Westchester County Journal News. One month prior to the wedding, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. divorced his first wife, Emily Black, the mother of his two oldest children, the newspaper reported.

He filed for divorce from Mary Kennedy two years ago, but the couple was still married at the time of her death, her family attorney, Kerry A. Lawrence, said.

OK, so RFK Jr. has been married twice and his second wife killed herself. What does this say about the Kennedy persona?

It says that this is a very disturbed family. And the way that some people worship them is horrible. But understandable. Because psychology shows that many people are attracted to darkness. And those people destroy entire societies.

Reported CNN.com:

Mary Kennedy was "a tremendously gifted architect and a pioneer and relentless advocate of green design who enhanced her cutting edge, energy efficient creations with exquisite taste and style," Robert F. Kennedy's family said in a statement.

She advocated finding a cure for food allergies and asthma and was a co-founder of the Food Allergy Initiative, which is the world's largest private source of funding for food allergy research, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s family said.

Yes, yes, “gifted” and “talented” and “an advocate” for this and that. All hyped up by the media. These Kennedys could fall down the stairs and the media would report the grace with which they tumbled.

CNN.com reported:

In the book, (RFK Jr.) wrote that (Mary Kennedy) had worked for the design firm Parish-Hadley and worked on the renovation of the Naval Observatory in Washington, the official residence of the U.S. vice president.

So even when given every possible advantage in life including wealth, four children and work on a prestigious landmark building, a liberal cannot be happy. This speaks volumes about liberalism.

Then of course you have a perfectly successful, normal, happy family-oriented man like Mitt Romney whose wonderful wife Ann, mother of five and grandmother of sixteen, has survived both multiple sclerosis and cancer and the media trash the Romneys as if they are devils.

Sarah Palin is a loving mother of five who worked her way up on her own merits to become governor of Alaska yet she is maliciously and viciously attacked for years on end by the same media that adore everything the Kennedys do.

Meanwhile genuine Christians who have good morals and a positive vision of the world are repeatedly maligned in the same media while the dark Kennedys are serially praised.

This is abhorrent behavior from an abhorrent media.